Council Minutes - Section B: Reports - 11 June 2013

Contents | Previous Page: Section A - Procedural Matters | Next Page: Section C - Common Seal

Reports tabled at the Ordinary Meeting of Council on Tuesday date held at City Hall, Little Malop Street in Geelong.


  1. Amendment C155 – 270-312 Plantation Road, Corio – Consideration of Submissions and Adoption

  2. Central Geelong Task Force

  3. Submission to Ministerial Advisory Council on Public Libraries – Stage 2: The Victorian Library Concept

  4. Procurement Policy

  5. Voluntary Levy – Constitutional Recognition ‘Yes’ Campaign

  6. Financial Management Report

  7. Geelong Major Events – January to March 2013 – Quarterly Report

  8. Central Geelong Marketing Committee – Report to Council 2011-2012

  9. Windsor Park Advisory Committee



1. Amendment C155 – 270-312 Plantation Road, Corio – Consideration of Submissions and Adoption

Portfolio:

Planning - Cr Macdonald

Source:

Economic Development, Planning and Tourism – Strategic Implementation

General Manager:

Peter Bettess


Summary

Cr Fisher moved, Cr Ansett seconded -

That Council:

  1. Adopt Amendment C155 in the form as outlined in Appendix 1 (A) – (D) and Appendix 2 to this report; and

  2. Submit the adopted Amendment together with the prescribed information to the Minister for Planning requesting approval.

  3. Sign and seal an agreement under Section 173 of the Planning and Environment Act, 19878 with the landowners in relation to:

Carried.


Report

Background

Amendment C155 is proposed to facilitate conventional residential development with a potential lot yield in the order of 200 lots.

A map showing the changes to the application of R1Z is provided at Appendix 1(B).

A map showing the changes to the application of DPO26 is provided at Appendix 1(C)

The proposed changes to the planning scheme, will facilitate the appropriate development of the land for conventional residential purposes.

The application of the schedule to the DPO will ensure that the development of the land appropriately addresses the provision of infrastructure and integration with its surrounds.


Discussion

Authorisation to exhibit the Amendment was sought following resolution by the ordinary meeting of Council held on 9th September 2008. Authorisation was received from the Minister for Planning by letter received on 29 September 2008.

Exhibition of the amendment was then delayed at the request of the proponent, while matters relating to the operation of the rendering plant at the Herd Abattoir were resolved by the EPA.

The Amendment was subsequently exhibited from 27 September 2012 to 29 October 2012. Notice of the amendment was given to owners and occupiers of affected land and to relevant authorities and Ministers in accordance with the requirements of the Planning and Environment Act 1987.

Four (4) submissions were received in response from the following public Authorities:

None of the authorities objected to the Amendment. Concerns initially raised by DSE in Appendix 3C(i) were resolved in Appendix 3C(ii).

Two submissions were received from members of the public. Matters raised in Submissions, Appendices 3E and 3G, were subsequently resolved to the satisfaction of those submittors. These changes are contained in the revised plan, Appendix 4, which forms part of the revised Schedule to the DPO.

A submission was also received from the proponent of the Amendment TGM Consultants (Appendix 3F). Matters raised in this submission have been considered by Council officers and addressed in the changes highlighted in red in the Schedule to the DPO, Appendix 2.

As all submissions have been resolved Council is able to adopt the amendment and refer it to the Minister for approval.


Environmental Implications

The changes to the planning scheme will not have any adverse environmental implications.


Financial Implications

The changes to the planning scheme will have no adverse financial implications for Council.


Policy/Legal/Statutory Implications

The amendment is considered to be consistent with State and Local planning policies as set out in the Explanatory Report, which forms part of the amendment documentation


Officer Direct or Indirect Interest

No Council officers involved in the preparation of this report have a direct or indirect interest, in accordance with Section 80(c) of the Local Government Act, to the matters to which this amendment relates.


Risk Assessment

There are no risks to Council associated with the application of the revised planning controls.


Social Considerations

The amendment is expected to result in net community benefit, through the provision of additional residential lots in an established residential area.


Communication

Amendment C155 and has been through a formal exhibition process, and both objecting submissions have been addressed to the satisfaction of the submittors concerned.


[Back to List]

2. Central Geelong Task Force

Portfolio:

Central Geelong - Cr Heagney

Source:

Planning – Central Geelong

General Manager:

Dean Frost and Peter Bettess

Index Reference:

Central Geelong Revitalisation
Council Reports 2013


Summary

Cr Heagney moved, Cr Richards seconded -

That Council:

  1. endorses the establishment of the Central Geelong Task Force Special Committee under Section 86 of the Local Government Act with initial delegation to produce the Master Plan as outlined in this report with the addition of a representative of Courthouse Arts to membership of the Stakeholder Reference Group; and

  2. notes that a Central Geelong Task Force will be established as a cross divisional working group bringing together the relevant expertise from across the Council, supplemented by other specialist expertise as appropriate.

Carried.


Report

Background

Geelong is Victoria’s second capital city. A vibrant and exciting city centre benefits all of Geelong and its region, as the cultural, retail, entertainment and business heart of the city and region. Central Geelong has 172,587 square metres of retail floor space of which 41% is in Westfield and Market Square. Central Geelong has 236,600 square

metres of office space. The top five employment categories based on 2011 data are Health Care (5,790 employees); Public Administration and Safety (3,112); Retail Trade (2,765); Education and Training (1,929); and Food and Beverage Services (1,687). The estimated resident population is 4,200 persons.

Re-vitalising and improving Central Geelong is a key issue for most people in Geelong. The people of Geelong want a city heart that all can be proud of. We need to re-create vibrancy and ‘bustle’, with more people shopping, working and living in Central Geelong and Waterfront.

Central Geelong needs to be actively promoted as the regional retail centre and services hub as well as being our key cultural, civic and dining centre. Central Geelong needs to be a friendly place for people of all ages with a strong perception of safety.

We need to make Central Geelong as attractive as possible for many more people to make their home. Projects delivering greater density of housing need to be encouraged and facilitated. Our Central Geelong has huge potential as a great place to live.


Discussion

While good work is occurring to improve Central Geelong, there is no readily identifiable current overall plan.

The current Central Geelong Structure Plan, Central Geelong – Looking Forward was published in 2007. While many of the strategies and actions remain relevant, a review is required. There needs to be a long term plan for Central Geelong which will give both certainty and encouragement to property owners to invest / upgrade their properties as well as improvements to public infrastructure – some short term, some longer term – but we need a plan that all can work towards achieving.

Vision 2 is an important element of the long term vision for Central Geelong. It includes bold ideas to improve the public realm to stimulate private sector investment in Central Geelong. There are many issues that need to be tackled to support a long term vision. The long term vision needs to be part of an overall Master Plan, which once agreed, requires an implementation plan that is ‘grounded’ so that we can take the best of the ideas and put them into effect where possible, practical and fundable.

The Mayor’s Central Geelong Vision statement for the election:

Central Geelong Task Force

Establish a high level Task Force to develop an overall Central Geelong and Waterfront Master Plan. This will include, but not be limited to:

This Task Force will undertake significant consultation and will bring together the work being done by Vision 2 and other stakeholders to deliver a Master Plan that gives clarity to Council and property owners, and enables appropriate development and improvements to be progressed. This Task Force will work closely with Enterprise Geelong.

This is by no means meant to be a comprehensive list of ideas and the success of measures to improve Central Geelong will require the input, ideas and involvement of many people.

The Mayor’s pre-election statement outlines his ideas for the Task Force. The targets and ideas are indicative only and are not yet endorsed by the Council. The Task Force Special Committee will through consultation and collaboration identify agreed targets, projects and activities for the Task Force.


The role of the Task Force

The Central Geelong Task Force is to develop an overall Master Plan for Central Geelong which is action oriented in intent, collaborative in process and advisory in making Central Geelong the premier mixed use activity hub for Geelong and the region.

In particular, the Central Geelong Task Force will:

  1. develop a Master Plan for Central Geelong which will inform planning and development decisions and encourage future developments and infrastructure improvements.

  2. develop business incentives and programs that could be considered to support Central Geelong development; and

  3. identify events and activities to bring more vitality to Central Geelong.

The key component of the Task Force’s work will be to develop principles derived from the Master Plan against which plans, works and activities can be assessed to ensure consistency with the Plan and the maximum value is achieved from investment. The conceptual framework is shown in the figure below.


Taskforce conceptual framework

  1. Place making will include the outcomes of Vision 2 to create a Central Geelong that has

    With Vision 2 completed, more specific action oriented projects need to be identified, prioritised, designed and costed. A specific area within Central Geelong may be the focus with the first round of public investment into place making being within this area to gain community support, business interest and Federal and State Government funding.

    The outcome will be a place making program of projects over the next 5+ years to:

  2. Business and investment incentive programs will be based on an understanding of what the obstacles are to developers, investors and business people in being more active in the Geelong Central Geelong and what the Council can do to address these obstacles.

    After defining the objectives a business and investment incentives program for the Geelong Central Geelong will be prepared. This will require expert professional advice to do these tasks with the advisors assisting with ongoing liaison and consultation with developers, investors and property owners.

    Research on what projects/initiatives other Australian and international cities have implemented to attract more investment and development will inform the development of the program. For example, under Melbourne City Council’s Postcode 3000 for city living projects the re-use of old buildings, including upper level floor space, was encouraged by providing a free advice service to owners on how to do conversions cheaply but well; approvals were streamlined; rate concessions were offered during the construction period; demonstration projects were completed; and open space fees were waived.

    Champions in the Geelong business community and potential alliance partners will be identified who are prepared to joint venture with Council to initiate change – particularly where there are benefits to the community as well as the property owner.

    The outcome will be a range of investment projects and initiatives to:

  3. A creative and distinctive events and activities program, building on what is already in place, is a key opportunity for Central Geelong to attract more tourists as well as draw in more residents to the City centre. The calendar of events and activities should seek to interconnect the waterfront with Central Geelong and cater for all tastes and age groups in terms of the performing arts, food and wine, cultural and recreational pursuits etc. The concept of a weekly farmers market should be explored as well as the potential for a “Salamanca style market’ along a key street.

The composition of the Central Geelong Task Force

The Task Force will comprise CoGG officers supplemented with external expertise, such as DTPLI, Places Victoria, DSDBI, experienced central city urban planners and business/property investment experts with specific skills in central city redevelopment. The team will be headed by a senior manager reporting to the General Manager, Projects, Recreation and Central Geelong. The Task Force’s work will be guided by an Special Committee.


The composition of the Central Geelong Task Force Special Committee

The Task Force Special Committee will comprise 8 specified members and the Mayor and CEO as ex-officio members. The ex-officio members are full members of the Committee by virtue of holding the office of Mayor and CEO. The ex-officio members have the same rights as other Committee members but are not counted in determining a quorum. There may be a need to pay the reasonable expenses of external urban planners. All other members would be voluntary. The person heading the Task Force will be an advisor to the Special Committee.

Precinct, portfolio or project technical advisory groups will be formed to work with the Task Force Special Committee on specific issues such as transport, safety, planning, disability access and youth. The relevant portfolio councillor will be a member of any technical advisory groups.

It is proposed that the Special Committee be established under Section 86 of the Local Government Act with delegation to produce the Master Plan; development initiatives/alliances; and activities/events for Council’s approval. The Council, on approval of the Master Plan; development initiatives/alliances; and activities/events, could extend the delegation to project implementation or other activities. A draft Terms of Reference and delegation is in Attachment 3.

The Task Force Special Committee will develop an engagement plan to engage with Central Geelong property owners and businesses. The Task Force Special Committee would also seek the advice of external experts and agencies from time to time such as Rob Adams from the City of Melbourne, the Property Council of Australia etc.

The Task Force Special Committee would determine its own timetable of meetings but 8 -10 meetings would be envisaged. Teleconferencing could be used where possible on occasions.

The Task Force Special Committee may consider establishing a stakeholder reference group with whom to consult, either individually or as a group.

The Task Force Special Committee should not be constrained but be able to consider any relevant issues for the Master Plan that would assist the successful and sustainable re-vitalisation of Central Geelong.

The Task Force Special Committee would operate for at least 3 years with potential to extend its term of involvement, if required.

The proposed organisational relationship is shown in the following diagram:


Proposed organsiational relationship for the Taskforce, Council and other stakeholders


Relationship to Central Geelong Marketing

The Special Committee will complement not compete with the work of Central Geelong Marketing. Central Geelong Marketing is considered by the Council and other stakeholders as the peak body representing traders and property owners in the Central Geelong area. It is established to market and promote Central Geelong through the special rate scheme. The Special Committee will generate plans, projects and ideas with the marketing/promotion of events and activities being done by Central Geelong Marketing.

Stakeholder Reference Group

A stakeholder reference group will be established. Membership will comprise:

The role of the Stakeholder Reference Group is to discuss and debate matters referred by the Task Force Special Committee. The stakeholder reference group has an informal liaison role rather than a formal advisory or decision-making role.

Responsibilities of reference group members:

Responsibilities of the Task Force Special Committee:

The stakeholder reference group will meet on an as needs basis, and no less than quarterly. The group will not need to vote on issues as the role of the stakeholder reference group is to debate concepts and new initiatives and then provide advice to the Task Force Special Committee. A general consensus on issues can be recorded in the meeting notes.

Resources to make it happen

The Central Geelong Task Force within the Council could be established from relevant staff already working on Central Geelong issues as a cross divisional working group dedicated to work in Central Geelong. The person heading up this team should have senior management status within the Council and be supported by people with expertise in such areas as:

The Central Geelong Task Force would initially prepare the Master Plan for Central Geelong based on the findings and recommendations of Vision 2; past and current studies/projects and analysis of any additional information required prior to the development of the Master Plan. The Central Geelong Task Force would prepare a work program with milestones for key outputs with tight timelines in place so as to get moving on the on-ground demonstration projects. The Central Geelong Task Force could be assembled within existing resources. External expertise would require a specific budget allocation if it was outside existing budgets.

A budget for the revitalisation of the Geelong Central Geelong

If Council is to demonstrate a commitment to revitalising Central Geelong then it will need to make an ongoing financial commitment, in addition to current commitments, to fund public works, activities etc for the Central Geelong Revitalisation Project.

This report assumes that the Task Force can be established within existing resources.

Revitalising a Central Geelong is a long process without a finish line – it is an ongoing, evolving and dynamic process. It will need substantial funding both from Council and external sources.


Environmental Implications

There are no environmental implications relevant to this report.


Financial Implications

The financial implications are discussed in the report.


Policy/Legal/Statutory Implications

Section 86 of the Local Government Act requires the Council to appoint members of the Special Committee and to approve the delegation. A further report will be submitted to the Council to appoint the members and approve the delegation once nominees are received for the Special Committee.


Officer Direct or Indirect Interest

No officers associated with the writing of this report have any direct or indirect interest in accordance with Section 80C of the Local Government Act.


Risk Assessment

There are no significant risks associated with this report. Risks relating to the establishment and operation of the Central Geelong Task Force or Special Committee will be managed as part of the establishment process.


Social Considerations

The Central Geelong Task Force will assist in addressing some of the social issues in Central Geelong.


Communication

A communication plan will need to be established.


[Back to List]

3. Submission to Ministerial Advisory Council on Public Libraries – Stage 2: The Victorian Library Concept

Portfolio:

Arts & Culture/Central Geelong - Cr Heagney

Source:

Community Services - Arts & Culture

General Manager:

Jenny McMahon

Index Reference:

Subject: Arts and Culture/Libraries/Geelong Regional Libraries


Summary

Cr Richards moved, Cr Heagney seconded -

That Council endorse the Greater Geelong City Council’s submission to the Ministerial Advisory Council Stage 2 of its review of Public Libraries in Victoria (Appendix 1).

Carried.


Report

Background

In February 2012, The Hon. David Morris MP, Parliamentary Secretary for Local Government and Chair of the Ministerial Advisory Council on Public Libraries wrote to the Mayor, Greater Geelong City Council advising that the Ministerial Council on Public Libraries (MAC) would be undertaking a comprehensive review of the future role and functions of public libraries in Victoria, recognising the changing nature of libraries. The MAC was established on bi-partisan lines.

As part of the review, Council was invited to make a submission into the provision of public library services in Victoria by 31 May 2012.

As part of the MAC review, Councillors, COGG Chief Executive Officer and senior management attended the MAC consultation that was held in Geelong on the 19 March 2012. The discussion paper ‘Tomorrow’s Library’ was the basis for the consultation and submission process.

At its meeting of 12 June 2012, Council endorsed a submission to respond to the first stage of the MAC review.

Stage 1 concluded in December 2012 with the release of the Review of Victorian Public Libraries Stage 1 Report. In summary the findings were:

Local Government and others have again been invited to make a submission in response to questions posed in the Stage 2 review.

As part of Stage 2 of the MAC review, Councillor’s, COGG Chief Executive Officer and senior management attended the MAC consultation meeting held in the Waurn Ponds Library on 14 March 2013.


Discussion

In response to the findings of Stage 1, the MAC has developed a proposed approach for future public library service provision titled The Victorian Library.

The new discussion paper developed by the MAC for Stage 2 is divided into two parts.

Part 1: The Victorian Library

The MAC proposed that the Victorian Library would be a seamless network of public library services that will enable access to information, resources and services to all Victorians, either in person, online and in a variety of formats, regardless of where they live, work, study or relax.

In order to achieve this approach, the MAC envisages that a number of interrelated state wide initiatives would be implemented including:

Part 2: Public Library Funding

Public library services are provided by Local Government with a contribution from State Government via:

Key Public Library Funding considerations include:

The discussion paper questions are listed in the attached submission with the City of Greater Geelong’s response following each question. The Geelong Regional Library Corporation (GRLC) submitted a response to Stage 2 of the MAC review. Council’s submission generally supports the GRLC’s position.


Environmental Implications

There are no specific environmental implications for council in the adoption of this report.


Financial Implications

There are no financial implications to the report.

Policy/Legal/Statutory Implications

Council’s submission will contribute to shaping the future of Victorian libraries.


Officer Direct or Indirect Interest

There is no direct interest by Council Officers involved in the preparation of this report.

Section 196(7A) of the Local Government Act exempts a member of the governing body of a regional library from having a conflict of interest if their only interest is as a Councillor or member of Council staff, who was appointed to the board by Council.


Risk Assessment

There are no risks associated with this submission.


Social Considerations

The MAC Review of Victorian Public Libraries Stage 1 Report concluded that public libraries:


Communication

The Arts & Culture department, in consultation with Marketing and Administration, will be responsible for communicating this report.


[Back to List]

4. Procurement Policy

Portfolio:

Governance – Cr Fagg (Mayor)

Source:

Corporate Services – Administration & Governance

General Manager:

Jeff Wall

Index Reference:

Procurement


Summary

Cr Farrell moved, Cr Macdonald seconded -

That consideration of the report be deferred.

Carried.


Report

Background

The LGA requires Council to review each financial year their current procurement policy and amend as appropriate.


Discussion

The procurement policy provides a framework for the purchase of goods, works and services that emphasises value for money while conducting business in a fair and equitable manner.

The purpose of the policy is to:

This year’s review has taken into consideration the recently released Victorian Local Government – Best Practice Procurement Guidelines 2013, and we have proposed some amendments as follows:


Environmental Implications

The policy states that sustained value must be demonstrated in Council’s purchasing, including the built and natural environment.


Financial Implications

Application of this policy will reaffirm Council’s objective of value for money outcomes.


Policy/Legal/Statutory Implications

The review of this policy accords with section 186a of the LGA.


Officer Direct or Indirect Interest

No officer involved in the preparation of this report has either a direct or indirect interest.


Risk Assessment

The policy requires that risk management is applied at all stages of procurement activities.


Social Considerations

The policy encourages the design and use of products and services which have minimal impact on the environment and community wellbeing.


Communication

Once endorsed by Council, the policy will be uploaded to the internet as a public policy and a copy of the policy made available at Council.


[Back to List]

5. Voluntary Levy – Constitutional Recognition ‘Yes’ Campaign

Portfolio:

Governance - Cr Fagg (Mayor)

Source:

Corporate Services – Administration and Governance

General Manager:

Jeff Wall

Index Reference:

Subject – Policy Development


Summary

Cr Richards moved, Cr Harwood seconded -

That Council not contribute direct funds to the campaign requested by the MAV but rather use its existing resources and communication channels to support constitutional recognition of local government.

Carried.

Cr E Kontelj left the meeting room at 8:14pm and returned at 8:16pm.


Background

Constitutional recognition of local government has been the subject of public debate over decades and two previous attempts in 1974 and 1988 failed.

In March 2011 Council considered a report on constitutional recognition and adopted the following motion:

That Council

  1. declares its support for recognition of Local Government in the Australian Constitution, particularly having regard to power for the Federal Government to directly fund Local Government,

  2. declares its support for the inclusion of Local Government in any new preamble to the Constitution if one is proposed,

  3. authorises the Mayor to write to the Prime Minister, Leader of the Opposition and Federal Members for Corio and Corangamite requesting their support for a referendum by 2013 to change the Constitution to allow financial recognition of Local Government.

Letters were sent in accordance with this decision.

In October 2011 Council provided a submission to an Expert Panel again supporting the constitutional recognition particularly in relation to inclusion of the power for the Commonwealth to directly fund local government.

On 14 December 2012 Council lodged a submission with the Joint Select Committee for the Constitutional Recognition of Local Government supporting amendment to section 96 of the constitution.

ALGA over the years has sought local government support for their campaign to achieve constitutional recognition of local government and has requested further support from Councils to fund a ‘Yes’ campaign.


Discussion

The Prime Minister recently announced that there will be a referendum on 14 September to recognise local government in our national Constitution.

In order to fund a national campaign ALGA and the MAV are seeking voluntary contributions from all councils across Australia.

The MAV has applied a mix of population and revenue analysis to determine what each Victorian councils contribution would be. They are seeking a voluntary contribution of $79,286 from the City of Greater Geelong towards this campaign.

Council has the capacity to support such a campaign through its existing resources and given the financial constraints that all local governments are experiencing, it is recommended that council decline the MAV request.

Environmental Implications

There are no environmental implications arising from this report.


Financial Implications

Recognition of local government in the Constitution will ensure the Commonwealth Government can provide funding directly to local councils, without having to pass the funding through the State Government, hence enabling timely receipt of funds and delivery of programs and projects.

  

Policy/Legal/Statutory Implications

Recognition of local government in the Constitution is an issue of national importance, given the vital role local government now plays in the Australian communities as the third tier of government and given the expanded role and crossover activities that local government is involved in, in the delivery of services be they state, federal or a combination of both.


Officer Direct or Indirect Interest

There are no Council Officers involved in preparing this report who have a direct or indirect interest.


Risk Assessment

Constitutional recognition will address risks associated with the Australian Government’s power to fund local government directly.


Social Considerations

Local government is an integral part of the governance of Australia and recognition within the Constitution is a vehicle for local autonomy.


Communication

The MAV is seeking council’s response to their request for voluntary funding, to determine the scope of the national campaign.

Council has the capacity to use existing resources to support the campaign by promoting it in City News, CityWeb and Community Update.


[Back to List]

6. Financial Management Report

Portfolio:

Finance - Cr S Kontelj

Source:

Corporate Services - Financial Services

General Manager:

Jeff Wall

Index Reference:

Financial Management \ Reporting


Summary

Cr Harwood moved, Cr Macdonald seconded -

That Council notes the Quarterly Financial Management Report to 31 March 2013.

Carried.

Cr J Irvine left the meeting room at 8:18pm and returned at 8:21pm.


Report

Background

The report is prepared as a requirement of Section 138 of the Local Government Act 1989 which requires that at least every three months a statement be presented to Council comparing the budget with the actual revenue and expense for the financial year-to-date.

Discussion

Operating

The March Management reports are provided in the following table to report year-to-date performance and full-year projection performance versus budget.

Financial Results Summary

Summary

 

YTD
Actual
$M

YTD Am. Bgt
$M

YTD Var

Fav/

(UnFav)
$M

FY Proj
$M

FY
Am. Bgt
$M

FY Var

Fav/

(UnFav)
$M

Recurrent Surplus/(Deficit)

0.77

(13.07)

13.84

(13.87)

(15.82)

1.95

Non-Recurrent Surplus/(Deficit)

32.64

30.28

2.36

56.36

46.28

10.08

Net Surplus/(Deficit)

33.41

17.21

16.20

42.49

30.46

12.03

Capital Expenditure

38.39

50.46

12.07

90.62

108.97

18.35

Closing Net Cash
Positive/(Neg)

61.74

76.06

(14.32)

 

50.59

 


The Adopted Budget was amended by Council on 28 August 2012 to include Carryover Capital and discretionary projects, plus other Capital and recurrent amendments.

The impact on the Recurrent Expenditure Budget is ($15.99M), consisting of carryover discretionary projects funded in 2011-2012, plus other budget amendments including adjustment for early receipt of first two quarters Grants Commission funding in June 2012.

The impact on Non Recurrent income was $3.10M for carryover of capital income from 2011-2012 projects.

The amended capital expenditure budget included an additional $58.76M to complete 2011-2012 Projects, including Civic Accommodation, Corio Landfill Rehabilitation and Ocean Grove Integrated Children’s Centre.


1. Recurrent Variance Commentary

 

YTD
Actual
$M

YTD Am. Bgt
$M

YTD Var

Fav/

(UnFav)
$M

FY Proj
$M

FY
Am. Bgt
$M

FY Var

Fav/

(UnFav)
$M

Recurrent Income

192.67

189.38

3.29

254.02

252.56

1.46

Recurrent Expenditure

191.90

202.45

10.55

267.89

268.38

0.49

Recurrent Surplus/(Deficit)

0.77

(13.07)

13.84

(13.87)

(15.82)

1.95

YTD Variance - $13.84M Favourable


The following major variances to budget contributed to this result:

Recurrent Income

 

$M

General Rates and Charges – Favourable rates generation and supplementary rates YTD, expected to be partially offset by objections in full year.

1.09

Government Grants

Main favourable variances consist of:

  • State Specific Purpose $1,199K favourable (Unbudgeted grants in Aged & Disability Services, Economic Development, Engineering Services, Family Services and Community Development).

  • Federal Child Care Assistance $211K favourable (Centre Based Long Day Care & Family Day Care Benefit).

  • State Recurrent $194K favourable (Aged & Disability Services).
    Offset by:

    • Federal – Other ($862K) unfavourable (Grants Commission payment will be ($1,150K) unfavourable full year).

0.86

User Charges

Main favourable variances consist of:

  • Waste Disposal – Commercial $951K favourable (Drysdale Landfill $567K, North Geelong Transfer Station $341K), partly offset by higher EPA Levies.

  • Private Works Income $132K favourable (Reinstatements).

    Offset by:

  • Activities & Program Fees ($1,053K) unfavourable (Centre Based Long Day Care ($589K) and Leisure Services Aquatic Centres ($548K).

0.05

Other Fees & Charges

Favourable mainly due to:

  • Fines & Costs $195K favourable (Parking Infringements $133K, Animal Infringements $72K).

  • Miscellaneous Approvals & Permits $113K favourable (Planning & Building Permits).

0.32

Sundry Income

Favourable due mainly to :

Reimbursements & Recoveries $539K – mainly unbudgeted receipts for Armstrong Creek Town Centre $327K and Lara Town Centre Expansion $135K (offset by expenditure).

Sundry Income $394K (Unbudgeted income for projects in Environment and Planning Strategy – will be offset by expenditure).

Offset by:

Infringements Withdrawn ($152K) unfavourable.

Interest on Investments

Pro rata higher than budgeted cash balances.

0.81

 

 

 

 

 

 

0.16

Recurrent Income Sub-total

$3.29M


Recurrent Expenditure

 

$M

Employee Related Expenditure – Favourable salary costs $3,550K mainly relating to unfilled vacancies and Workcover $190K.

Partially offset by unfavourable supplementary labour costs ($1,046K) (see external services).

3.74

General Works:

Materials $324K favourable with the main variances being Ground Maintenance Materials $225K (ground renovations in progress) and Road Making Materials $200K (invoices yet to be received).

3.96

Plant / Equip / Vehicle Costs $201K favourable with the main variances being Repairs & Maintenance $63K and Fuels, Oils & Greases $82K (all phasing only).

External Services is $3,431K favourable mainly due to:

Contractors $3,989K favourable - Phasing variances in Discretionary projects $2,655K and Recurrent projects $1,334K.

  • Contributions $1,223K favourable – Second contribution to Geelong Gallery $499K not yet made, plus phasing variances in Events Services $284K, Community Development $185K, Capital Projects $117K and Sport & Recreation $94K.

  • Civic Allowances $170K favourable – Phasing only, allowances now made monthly but budgeted as quarterly.

  • Insurance Premium ($278K) unfavourable – premium higher than budget.

  • Rental Expense ($718K) unfavourable – due mainly to continued rent for Brougham and Corio St. and payment of $360K for surrender of Myers St lease.

  • Supplementary Labour ($1,046K) unfavourable – mainly, Operations ($317K), Health & Local Laws ($230K), Parks ($214K), Fleet ($161K) and Planning Strategy ($76K).

 

Administration costs $914K favourable mainly due to :

  • Interest Paid $733K favourable – due to deferred loans.

  • Training & Development $114K, Corporate Costs $100K, Postage $76K, External Printing $92K and Leases $62K.

Offset by unfavourable phasing variance in:

  • Computer Software ($320K) unfavourable – due to early payment of maintenance support to gain savings.

0.91

Professional Services costs $244K favourable mainly due to:

  • Consultants $191K favourable – Phasing only.

  • Audit Services $167K favourable - Phasing only.

  • Valuation Services $118K – Phasing only.

  • Legal Expenses ($236K) unfavourable – Unbudgeted expense in Waste Services ($48K), Central Geelong ($61K) and Environment ($24K), plus unfavourable variance in City Development ($69K) – mainly VCAT appeals.

0.24

Utility costs are $308K favourable mainly due to Electricity $345K (phasing only).

0.31

Depreciation costs $1,870K favourable (partly due to delay in completion of Drysdale Landfill Cell $450K plus phasing).

1.87

Gain/(Loss) on Sale of Plant and Equipment ($480K) unfavourable.

(0.48)

Recurrent Expenditure Sub-total

$10.55M



Full Year Recurrent Projection – $1.95M favourable to Amended Budget

The main projection changes are favourable / (unfavourable):

$M

Grants Commission decrease

(1.15)

Rental Expense – Brougham St & Corio St (Jan to June 2013)

Leisure Centres – Net Income / Expenditure

Legal Costs increase

(0.90)

(0.43)

(0.31)

Insurance Premium Increase

Centre Based Long Day Care – Net Income / Expenditure

(0.27)

(0.21)

Library Cleaning Contract (new 4 year contract)

(0.13)

Transfers from Capital to Recurrent / Recurrent to Capital

Salaries / Supplementary Labour (vacant positions)

Reduction in Depreciation

(0.10)

1.38

1.40

Interest Paid Saving – deferment of loan for Civic Accommodation

Commercial Waste Income – net of EPA Levy

0.92

0.67

Workcover Premium saving

0.52

Interest Savings – deferment of $10.8M budgeted loans

0.30

Myers St – Surrender of lease savings

0.19

Other

0.07

 

$1.95M



2. Non Recurrent Variance Commentary

 

YTD
Actual
$M

YTD Am. Bgt*
$M

YTD Var

Fav/

(UnFav)
$M

FY Proj
$M

FY
Am. Bgt*
$M

FY Var

Fav/

(UnFav)
$M

Non-Recurrent Surplus/(Deficit)

32.64

30.28

2.36

56.36

46.28

10.08

 

YTD Variance – $2.36M favourable

 

$M

Capital Grants & Income ($183K) unfavourable.

(0.18)

Unfunded Superannuation $1,205K favourable – savings on early payment of liability.

1.21

Developer Contributions $2,279K favourable – mainly Public Open Space Levies $419K, Drainage Levies $142K and Water Quality Levies $236K favourable, plus unbudgeted Community and Development Infrastructure Levies $1,482K.

2.28

Prior year Adjustments ($544K) unfavourable – Capital Work in Progress expensed.

(0.54)

Other Phasing Variances

 

Recognition of Infrastructure ($82K) unfavourable.

(0.08)

Loss on Disposal of Infrastructure $1,814K favourable.

1.81

Gain/(Loss) on Sale of Property - ($2,126K) unfavourable.

(2.13)


3. Capital Expenditure Variance Commentary

 

YTD
Actual
$M

YTD Projection
$M

YTD Var

Fav/

(UnFav)
$M

FY Proj
$M

FY
Am. Bgt*
$M

FY Var

Fav/

(UnFav)
$M

Capital Expenditure

38.39

50.46

12.07

90.62

108.97

18.35


YTD Variance – $12.07M favourable

The capital program is $12.07M underspent compared to Projection year to date, with the major project variances as follows:

 

$M

Heavy & Dedicated Fleet – major tender now actioned.

1.55

Light Fleet Replacement – awaiting delivery.

0.77

Clean Energy – Bldg, Plant & Equip – project yet to commence.

0.73

Building Renewal Works – behind budget schedule.

0.56

Corio – Norlane Regeneration Project - behind budget schedule.

0.54

Drysdale Landfill Cell 4A – project delayed due to wet weather.

0.44

Griggs Creek Rehabilitation – project delayed.

0.40

Lara Sporting Club Development - behind budget schedule.

0.39

Corio Landfill Rehabilitation – behind budget schedule.

0.39

Splashdown Co-Generation Plant – project exceeded budget.

(0.15)

Shell Road Reserve Sporting Infrastructure – project ahead of schedule.

(0.32)

Ocean Grove Integrated Children’s Centre – project ahead of schedule.

(0.41)

Other

7.18

 

$12.07M



4. Cash and Investments

 

YTD
Actual
$M

YTD Am. Bgt*
$M

YTD Var

Fav/

(UnFav)
$M

FY Proj
$M

FY
Am. Bgt*
$M

FY Var

Fav/

(UnFav)
$M

Closing Net Cash
Positive/(Neg)

61.74

76.06

(14.32)

 

50.59

 



YTD Variance – ($14.32) unfavourable

The month end cash and investments balance was $61.74M. This was ($14.32M) unfavourable to budget, mainly due to unbudgeted payment of $17.0M made towards outstanding balance of Unfunded Superannuation Liability.

Council has future commitments for $22.9M, which are fully cashed back:

Long Service Leave

$16.8M

Statutory Reserves

$ 0.6M

Refundable Deposits

$ 3.8M

Income in Advance

$ 1.4M

Asset Development

$ 0.3M

Total

$22.9M


The Landfill Provision balance is currently $18.0M.


Environmental Implications

There are no environmental implications arising from this report.


Financial Implications

As detailed in the attached report.


Policy/Legal/Statutory Implications

The report is provided in accordance with requirements under the Local Government Act 1989.

Officer Direct or Indirect Interest

Council staff preparing this report have no direct or indirect interest.


Risk Assessment

There are no risk implications arising from this report.


Social Considerations

There are no social implications arising from this report.


Communication

The attached report is provided for information and public record and is available from the Council Governance or Financial Reporting units


[Back to List]

7. Geelong Major Events - January to March 2013 Quarterly Report

Portfolio:

Tourism and Major Events – Cr R Nelson

Source:

Projects, Recreation and Central Geelong / Events

General Manager:

Dean Frost

Index Reference:

Subject - Geelong Major Events General


Summary

Cr Harwood moved, Cr Fisher seconded -

That Council notes the report detailing the activities of Geelong Major Events for the January 1 – 31 March 2013 period.

Carried.


Report

Background

Council, in August 1998, established a Section 86 Committee under the provisions of the Local Government Act known as Geelong Major Events (GME) as a means of stimulating and encouraging events within the municipality.

In line with the Geelong Major Events Terms of Reference, an annual report will be presented to Council at the conclusion of the financial year. This report provides an update on the activities supported by GME for the period 1 January to 31 March 2013.

Discussion

Meetings

GME convened three ordinary meetings in the period between 1 January 2013 and 31 March 2013.

Meetings are currently scheduled for the third Monday of each month commencing at 4.00pm, held at City Hall. GME meetings are open to the public.

Details of major events staged during the period


Event Title

Date

 

Funding amount

Estimated Economic Benefit

Mitchelton Bay Cycling Classic

Jan1-3

$30,000

$2.285million

*Festival of Sails

Jan 24-26

$172,000

$10.5million

*Australian Youth Baseball Championships

Jan 11 - 20

$10,000

$1.2million

Geelong Multi-Sport Festival

Feb 8-10

$150,000

$3.040million

Melbourne Rebels Rugby @ Simonds Stadium

Feb 9

$8,639

$402k

*WH Pincott Barwon Regatta

Jan 26-27

$5,000

 

$350k

Victorian Open Golf Championships

Feb 21-24

$90,000

$1.994million

Pako Festa

Feb 23

$50,000

$4.796million

Geelong Highland Gathering

Mar 3

$30,000

$273k

*Head of the Schoolgirls

Mar 16 - 17

$20,000

$2million

*Sanitarium Weet-Bix Kids TRYathlon

Mar 17

$5,000

$450k

*Australian International Airshow

Feb 26 – 3 Mar

$407,507

$20million


* The Final post event evaluation has not been completed for this event, therefore the pre-event estimated economic benefits has been used for this report.

Details of GME funding decisions for the period


Event Title

Date

 

Funding amount

2013 Geelong Revival (Motorsport) event

Nov/Dec 2013

$120,000


Environmental Implications

Geelong Major Events has adopted a methodology for assessing event funding applications and event evaluations. This methodology measures the triple bottom line effect; Economic Impact, Social Impact and Environmental Impact.

Each Geelong Major Events funding application is assessed according to the methodology and a value is attributed to the perceived Environmental benefit relative to the environmental negative impacts associated with the event.

Considerations of positive and negative impact include energy usage, and use of renewable sources, water usage, waste and or recycling generated, traffic congestion, use of non-powered transport options, pollution, destruction or damage to natural environments, event legacies of new or reinvigorated nature and resources.

The environmental impact for each event is assessed and where appropriate actions are identified to protect the environment.

Given the nature of events and the variety of events staged within the Geelong region via Geelong Major Events support, some are environmentally friendly while others manage the environmental impacts as well as possible.

The City plays a leading role in working with external agencies and event organisers to ensure that environmental implications are appropriately managed.

Where practicable, event organisers are encouraged or incentivised to implement a variety of environmentally positive programs such as waste-wise and carbon offsets.

The events staged in this period implemented a range of programs to minimise their environmental impacts and to proactively provide positive legacies from their events. They included shuttle bus services to minimise traffic to and from the event, the use of recycled water for filling of traffic barriers and a carbon neutral tree planting program.


Financial Implications

The funding commitments of $120,000 approved during the period were within the allocated GME budget.

The Event Expenditure estimated to be generated by the seven events staged during the period January 1 2013 to March 31 2013 is estimated to be $47.3million. This event expenditure is estimated to support the equivalent of 378* full-time jobs in Greater Geelong.

*EFT calculation is based on GOT accepted methodology and sourced from the Tourism Research & Impact Assessment for the Geelong Otway Region, Feb 2007.


Policy/Legal/Statutory Implications

In supporting major events contractual relationships are entered into generally based on a standard contract prepared by the City’s solicitors.


Officer Direct or Indirect Interest

No Council officers involved in the preparation of this report have a direct or indirect interest in matters for consideration.


Risk Assessment

The management of risks associated with events is an important aspect to protect the community and the City’s assets. Particular attention is undertaken to identify potential risks with each event and ensure that the appropriate risk management treatments are in place.

All high risk major events are required to present event plans to the Events Multi Agency Working Group, coordinated via the City’s Events Services Unit. Feedback and advice is given to event organisers from the represented agencies and stakeholders on the working group.

The expertise within the City’s Risk Management Business Unit is drawn upon to support events as and when required.


Social Considerations

Geelong Major Events make a significant contribution to the social, environmental and economic well being of the community. The major events often provide a legacy for future events and community use such as redeveloped or newly constructed infrastructure.

The events staged within this period provided social benefits for the local community through participation and spectator opportunities with eight of these major events offering free public access and entertainment for all ages.

The Pako Festa and Festival of Sails were, in particular, celebrations of Geelong’s culture and were staged strategically in open public spaces to provide free, family entertainment and activity that is accessible for all.

An estimated 400,000 spectators attended the 12 events staged in the three months ending 31 March 2013.

Communication

The achievements of Council and GME in supporting events and the associated benefits provided are communicated via a range of mediums.


[Back to List]

8. Central Geelong Marketing Committee - Report to Council 2011-2012

Portfolio:

Central Geelong - Cr Heagney

Source:

Projects, Recreation & Central Geelong / Central Geelong Marketing

General Manager:

Dean Frost

Index Reference:

Subject: Central Geelong Marketing Committee


Summary

Cr Heagney moved, Cr Ansett seconded -

That Council notes the report.

Carried.


Report

Background

The Special Rate in Central Geelong has been in operation since 2001 via three five year terms. This Committee has delegated authority to administer the proceeds of a five year special rate on non-residential properties for marketing and promoting Central Geelong.

The Special Rate in 2011-2012 raised $602,000 from 1,541 businesses. Additional income from farmers’ market stallholder fees and partnerships took total income for 2011-12 to $609,000. The Committee is responsible for organising activities such as the Central Geelong Farmers Market, the Central Geelong Sidewalk Sales, the Central Geelong School Holiday Program, the Central Geelong Magic Meter Elves, May Magic, Tastes of Central Geelong and the Christmas in Central Geelong promotion. The estimated economic benefit of activities by the Central Geelong Marketing Committee to Central Geelong Business Operators in 2011-2012 has grown substantially and has been measured to be in excess of $5 million in 2011-12 from both directly presented activities and sponsored activities.

In addition, CGM provides a range of business development activities including a professional development and training program for business operators, conducts regular networking opportunities, has developed and maintains a website www.centralgeelong.com.au which provides an online business directory for all businesses within the special rate area.

The committee delivers a consolidated advertising campaign to promote the range of businesses on offer in Central Geelong throughout the Geelong region and surrounding areas. Social media and digital communications are recognised as key areas of future growth with the introduction of Central Geelong Marketing’s Facebook and Twitter pages.

The Central Geelong Marketing Committee special rate is one of the largest operating within Australia and received Mainstreet Australia awards in 2012 for ‘Council that best supports a special rate’ and Best Activity/ Initiative with a special rate above $100,000 for the inaugural Tastes of Central Geelong event.


Discussion

The Central Geelong Marketing Committee met 11 times in the period between 1 July 2011 and 30 June 2012. All were ordinary meetings. Issues relating to strategic planning, finance and administration were dealt with at full committee level. To ensure objectives were met, specific programs and activities were driven through sub-committees for Marketing and Evaluation and overseen by the full committee.

Strategic Framework 2012-2015

In April of each year, the Committee meets to review the three year rolling Strategic Framework and to establish the next Annual Activities Plan.

The Central Geelong Marketing Committee Strategic Framework focuses on three key questions and addresses the challenges and opportunities within each key focus area.

This was developed into the Central Geelong Marketing Committee Strategic Framework 2011-14. A broad outline of this framework follows.

CGM’s Vision – ‘Central Geelong – a vibrant place of choice’

Key Focus Area 1 – More People – Growing the number of customers, workers, residents, students and visitors experiencing and enjoying Central Geelong through:

Key Focus Area 2 – More business – Creating business opportunity through:

Key Focus Area 3 – More support – Growing CGM’s capability to provide effective leadership through a coordinated approach to robust strategic planning, the delivery of valued programs, effective communication and advocacy through:

Annual Activities Plan 2011-2012

The annual activities plan for 2011-2012 consisted of 72 specific programs within the key focus areas with more than 300+ delivered activities.

These programs were developed into a program of events and activities which have been delivered according to the agreed Annual Activities Plan.

Key Focus Area 1 - More People: Growing the number of customers, workers, residents and visitors experiencing Central Geelong

Marketing – raise the community’s appreciation of Central Geelong

Promotions - Undertake promotions that attract people to Central Geelong and raise the profile of Central Geelong businesses

Events - Develop, support and/or implement events that grow Central Geelong’s reputation as a leading business and cultural precinct

Key Focus Area 2- More Business: Growing the capability of Central Geelong’s businesses

Business Presentation - Foster improved business presentation and appearance;

Business Capability - Support improved business capability through education, training and the dissemination of relevant information

Networking - Foster effective networking between Central Geelong businesses, business organisations and key agencies

Business Attraction - Attract new business to Central Geelong

Key Focus Area 3 - More Support. Growing CGM’s capability to provide effective leadership through robust strategic planning, the delivery of valued programs and effective communication.

Stakeholder Communication – Develop a high level of awareness and understanding amongst key stakeholders through effective communication;

Research – Gather and disseminate relevant information about Central Geelong

Strategic Influence – Influence the agenda for economic development, tourism, events and infrastructure relevant to Central Geelong

Strategic Planning – Develop, implement and evaluate an effective strategic plan

Governance - Ensure the ongoing and effective administration of CGM

CGM fully expended its budget within the 2011-12 financial year with some activities associated with the 2012 Tastes of Central Geelong event (July 2012) included within the 2011-12 expenses within the following broad areas.


Marketing & Promotions (including project delivery)

$473,000

Evaluation

$ 14,000

Administration

$122,000

TOTAL

$609,000



Environmental Implications

There are no environmental considerations associated with the special rate program.


Financial Implications

There are no financial implications associated with this report.

Activities from the flagship Central Geelong Marketing activities of Central Geelong Farmers Market, Sidewalk Sales, Christmas in Central Geelong, May Magic, Tastes of Central Geelong and the School Holiday Fun Program bring an estimated economic benefit of over $5 million (*) to Central Geelong business operators which is more than eight times the monies generated from the special rate. (*) Note this figure uses Geelong Major Events established multipliers

Central Geelong Marketing, through its consolidated approach is able to leverage its programs to obtain significant financial and in-kind support and bulk purchasing discounts to greatly increases the benefits obtained with the special rate funds. This is estimated at over $100,000 in 2011-12.


Policy/Legal/Statutory Implications

There are no Policy/Legal/Statutory implications associated with this report. All activities undertaken were within the Committee’s terms of reference as specified by Council.


Officer Direct or Indirect Interest

Nil


Risk Assessment

There are no risk assessment implications associated with this report.


Social Considerations

The activities and programs that result from the special rate add significantly to the vibrancy and exciting experience of Central Geelong.

There are no social considerations associated with the on-going special rate.

The ongoing success of Central Geelong as the “heart” of the region is an essential element of broader community benefit.


Communication

The Committee regularly communicates with business operators and property owners in the Central Geelong area via newsletters, regular emails, a dedicated website, workshops, networking, surveys and personal visits.



[Back to List]

9. Windsor Park Advisory Committee

Portfolio:

Sport & Recreation – Cr Irvine

Source:

Projects, Recreation & Central Geelong / Sport & Recreation

General Manager:

Dean Frost

Index Reference:

Property: 39A Rose Ave, Norlane (ID#291789)


Summary

Cr Irvine moved, Cr Fisher seconded -

That Council:

  1. Note that the Windsor Park Advisory Committee has ceased to operate as a formal Committee of Council, and

  2. Acknowledge the work of past and current committee representatives.

Carried.


Report

Background

Windsor Park is a recreation reserve located at 39 Rose Avenue, Norlane. Windsor Park provides facilities for a number of sporting clubs and user groups (outlined below).

The Windsor Park Advisory Committee (WPAC) has operated for the last decade to provide the opportunity for tenants to provide strategic advice on the development of the reserve. The committee consists of the following representatives:

The committee generally meets on a quarterly basis. The administration of the committee is undertaken by the Recreation & Open Space department and is chaired by the Ward Councillor.

Discussion

The WPAC has played an important role in providing direction for development of Windsor Park. This advisory role recently culminated in the review of the Windsor Park Master Plan (endorsed by Council 10 July 2012). The consultation process for the master plan focused on the WPAC as the primary group of active users within the reserve and provided a number of opportunities for input and feedback from the committee.

During the last 12 months, the Windsor Park Master Plan has been endorsed and clear direction for the future development of the reserve established. As a result, the strategic planning function of the WPAC has diminished and discussion has focused on operational issues such as maintenance and events.

As the function of the WPAC had moved from providing strategic advice to discussing operational matters, it was proposed to committee representatives that the committee cease operating as a formal Committee of Council. No objections were received from committee representatives and a decision was made at a WPAC meeting held on 15 March 2013 to cease the operation of the committee.

The WPAC have been advised that the committee can continue to meet without the administrative oversight of Council. All WPAC representatives were supplied with a copy of the Windsor Park Master Plan and a contact list to aid in communication between user groups. The relationships established through the WPAC will ensure that dialogue between groups remains available.

Council will continue to engage with the user groups at Windsor Park for specific projects and issues as they arise. The Windsor Park Master Plan outlines clear priorities for implementation over the next 10 years and a range of stakeholders to be consulted in relation to the development of the reserve.


Environmental Implications

There are no environmental implications associated with this report.


Financial Implications

There are no financial implications associated with this report.


Policy/Legal/Statutory Implications

Windsor Park is currently the only local recreation reserve with an associated Committee of Council. While the WPAC has played an important role in the past, this role has diminished somewhat in the last 12-18 months. The user groups have placed no objections to ceasing the operation of the WPAC.


Officer Direct or Indirect Interest

There are no direct or indirect interests to be noted in association with this report.


Risk Assessment

There are no direct risks associated with the recommendation to cease the operation of the WPAC.


Social Considerations

The WPAC has provided an opportunity for direct input by tenants and user groups into strategic planning, and networking between representatives from the various groups included on the WPAC.

The impact of ceasing the operation of the WPAC is minimal considering the strategic direction for the development of the reserve is confirmed within the master plan and communication on operational matters is undertaken between the tenant and Council officers directly.

The value of formal meetings has decreased since the completion of the master planning process. In addition to this, the ease with which all tenants and user groups can communicate with Council and between each other has increased through the use of email, decreasing the need for formal meetings that are administered by Council.


Communication

WPAC representatives were notified of the intention to cease the operation of the committee as a formal Committee of Council on 28 February 2013. This communication was repeated on 13 March 2013 when the agenda for the upcoming WPAC meeting was distributed. No objections or questions regarding the intention to cease the WPAC were received.

At the meeting of the WPAC held on 15 March 2013, it was determined that the committee would cease to operate at the completion of the meeting.

On 18 March 2013, an email was sent to all WPAC representatives informing them of the outcome of the meeting and thanking them for their contribution to the committee.


[Back to List]

Contents | Previous Page: Section A - Procedural Matters | Next Page: Section C - Common Seal