Council Minutes - Section B: Reports - 11 September 2018

Contents | Previous Page: Section A - Procedural Matters | Next Page: Section C - Urgent Business

Reports tabled at the Community Focus Committee Meeting of Council on Tuesday 11 September 2018, held at the Lara Sporting Club, 1 Mill Road, Lara.


  1. Amendment C368 and Planning Permit 11/2017 – 143-179 Flinders Avenue, Lara – Consideration of Panel Report and Adoption

  2. Lara Prison Expansion Project – 110-160 Peak School Road and 5-75 Chisholm Road, Lara

  3. Access and Inclusion Plan

  4. Municipal Early Years Plan 2018-2022

  5. Community Zero Carbon Action Plan 2018-2020

  6. Central Geelong Marketing Committee – Annual Activities Report 2017-2018 and Proposed Terms of Reference Changes

  7. Heritage Advisory Committee Updated Terms of Reference

  8. Revocation of Flood Prone Area Designation of New Lots at Warralily, Stages 72, 74, 75, 113 and 118

  9. Revocation of Flood Prone Area Designation of New Lots at Armstrong Waters, Stage 5


1. Amendment C368 and Planning Permit 11/2017 – 143-179 Flinders Avenue, Lara – Consideration of Panel Report and Adoption

Source:

Planning & Development - Strategic Implementation

Acting Director:

Joanne Van Slageren

Portfolio:

Sustainable Development


Purpose

To consider the Panel Report about Amendment C368 and PP11/2017 and to adopt the Amendment and recommend to the Minister that he approve the Amendment and Planning Permit.


Background

The Amendment re-zones land at 143 – 179 Flinders Avenue, Lara from the Rural Living Zone (RLZ) to the General Residential Zone, schedule 1 (GRZ1). The Planning Permit PP11/2017 allows the staged subdivision of the re-zoned land into conventional residential lots.

The Amendment was exhibited between 9 November and 11 December 2017.

Fifty (50) submissions were received in response to the exhibition of the Amendment and Planning Permit application.

All submissions were referred to an independent Panel, appointed by the Minister for Planning. A Directions Hearing was held on Monday 9 March 2018. The Panel hearing was held on 23 April 2018 and the Panel Report received on 13 June 2018.


Key Issues

The Panel conclusions included that:

Councillor Asher moved, Councillor Aitken seconded -

That the report be deferred.

Carried.


[Back to List]

2. Lara Prison Expansion Project – 110-160 Peak School Road and 5-75 Chisholm Road, Lara

Source:

Planning & Development - City Development

Acting Director:

Joanne Van Slagerenn

Portfolio

Community Health and Safety


Purpose

To seek Council’s support for an amendment to the Planning Scheme to rezone land adjacent to the Lara Prison Precinct to facilitate a new 700 bed maximum-security facility.


Background

The City has received correspondence from the Department of Justice and Regulation seeking support for an amendment to rezone land adjoining the existing Lara Prison complex to allow the development of a new maximum security facility. In mid-September, the Minister for Corrections will request the Minister for Planning to prepare an amendment to rezone the land. Land to the west is already zoned Special Use Zone Schedule 9 (SUZ9) and is developed as a prison complex including the maximum security 448-bed Barwon Prison, the 394-bed medium security Marngoneet Correctional Centre and its Karreenga facility annex. Barwon Prison was opened in 1990, Marngonnet in 2006 and Karreenga in 2016.


Key Issues

Councillor Mason moved, Councillor Aitken seconded -

That Council:

  1. supports the Department of Justice and Regulation’s proposal to amend the Planning Scheme to rezone the land at 110-160 Peak School Road and 5-75 Chisholm Road, Lara from Farming Zone to Special Use Zone – Schedule 9; and

  2. notes that the Department of Justice and Regulation will consult with the local community about the project and amendment.

Carried.


Attachment 1

Financial Implications

There are no financial implications arising from this report.


Community Engagement

The Department of Justice is undertaking community consultation. A Community Advisory Group to be established which will include local representation.


Policy/Legal/Statutory Implications

There is no specific planning policy on prison facilities within the Planning Scheme. The proposed amendment generally implements the objectives of planning in Victoria and is supported by the strategies in the Planning Policy Framework.

The new prison will meet a need for additional prison facilities and its provision is seen as an essential part of the Government’s commitment to improving community safety. The siting adds to an existing facility where infrastructure is already provided, in a setting away from the township area of Lara.


Social Equity Considerations

There are no social equity considerations.


Alignment to Council Plan

The proposal aligns with the ‘Improved Health and Safety of our Community’, ‘Informed Social Infrastructure and Planning’, ‘Planned Sustainable Development’, and ‘A Thriving and Sustainable Economy’ of Council Plan through the citing of a new facility adjacent to the existing prison complex in the north of the municipality.


Conflict of Interest

No Council Officers have any direct or indirect interest, in accordance with Section 80C of the Local Government Act to which this Amendment relates.


Risk Assessment

All risks with the application are being managed by the Department of Justice and regulations. There are no risks with either implementing or not implementing the recommendations of this report.


Environmental Implications

Investigations are ongoing to assess flora and fauna presence and to identify any required mitigation measures. The ESO4 applicable to the land at 110-160 Peak School Road will have to be addressed in the development approval process.


Attachment 2

Letter from Department of Justice - page 1 of 3 pages

Note - the red outline of the site on the map in the letter has shifted unintentionally in drafting. For clarity, the site comprises No. 100-160 Peak School Road and 5-75 Chisolm Road, as shown on the following plan:


Letter from Department of Justice - page 2 of 3 pages

Letter from Department of Justice - page 3 of 3 pages

[Back to List]

3. Access and Inclusion Action Plan

Source:

Community Life – Connected Communities

Acting Director:

Robyn Stevens

Portfolio:

Sustainable Development


Purpose

To present the draft Access and Inclusion Action Plan 2018–2022 to Council and seek approval to release the plan for community consultation for a period of four weeks.


Background

The first Disability Action Plan in the City of Greater Geelong was adopted in 2002. Since then, there have been regular updates to the plan and from this year it will be referred to as the Access and Inclusion Action Plan to reflect the current sector approach.

Each plan has promoted access and inclusion for people with disability in all parts of community and civic life, but with a particular focus on reducing barriers for people with disability in accessing goods and services and employment, promoting participation in community life and reducing discrimination.

Key achievements from the 2014-2017 plan include: Changing Places and adult change facilities being installed, Johnstone Park accessibility improvements, Geelong Revival Festival used as platform for distributing postcards featuring local artists with a disability, Access All Areas Film Festival at Geelong Performing Arts Centre, Geelong Library and Heritage Centre Exhibition: One Million Stars to End Violence, and Mobility Access Directories being developed and made available to the community.


Key Issues

Councillor Mansfield moved, Councillor Grzybek seconded -

That Council release the draft Access and Inclusion Plan 2018–2022 for public comment for a period of four weeks.

Councillor Nelson left the meeting room at 8:48pm

Councillor Nelson re-entered the meeting room at 8:51pm

Carried.


Attachment 1

Financial Implications

The 2018/2019 budget includes an allocation of $29,500 to support implementation activities associated with the AIAP. A budget allocation will be required for subsequent years.

In addition, the long-term recurrent funding for Building Inclusive Communities (formerly Rural Access) from the Department of Health and Human Services of $289,000 per annum will cease in June 2019. Short-term project based funding will become available from the National Disability Insurance Agency (NDIA), and Council will need to determine what resources and additional funding will be required to maintain our commitment to community members with disabilities.


Community Engagement

Extensive internal consultation, as well as targeted external consultation including consultation with the City’s Access and Inclusion Advisory Committee, has contributed to the development of the draft AIAP. The public exhibition period will ensure interests and ideas of the broader community can be included as part of the final plan.


Social Equity Considerations

Implementation of the AIAP will continue to embed enhanced opportunities for people with disabilities to participate in community life, and for the community to be enriched by their inclusion. It is also expected that there will be a flow-on to the wider community of understanding and consideration for the inclusion of people with disabilities in all aspects of community life. The AIAP aims to promote the development of sustainable organisational structures to help minimise access and inclusion issues and looks to achieve this goal through our social inclusion principles:


Policy/Legal/Statutory Implications

Section 38 of the Disability Act 2006 specifies that a public sector body must ensure that a Disability Action Plan is prepared for the purpose of:

Council’s AIAP specifies the actions Council will take to reduce discrimination of people with disabilities in these areas.


Alignment to Council Plan

The AIAP aligns to the Council Plan strategic priority to ‘create a more inclusive and diverse community’. A key strategy to achieve this is improving access to facilities and programs for people of all abilities. The actions in the AIAP will support the delivery of this priority.


Conflict of Interest

No officer involved in the preparation of any aspect of this report has any direct or indirect conflicts of interest.


Risk Assessment

The AIAP will enable Council to address its statutory requirements in addressing barriers for participation for people with disability.


Environmental Implications

Not applicable.


[Back to List]

4. Municipal Early Years Plan 2018-2022

Source:

Community Life - Family Services

Director:

Linda Quinn

Portfolio

An Inclusive and Diverse Community


Purpose

To present the draft Municipal Early Years Plan 2018-2022 (MEYP) to Council and seek approval to release the plan for community consultation for a period of four weeks.


Background

The Municipal Early Years Plan 2018-2022 (MEYP) sets out a range of key strategies and actions for the next four years to address local needs and priorities to improve the health and wellbeing of children aged 0-8 and their families in the City of Greater Geelong.

The MEYP is a key strategic priority in the Council Plan 2018-2022. The Greater Geelong: A Clever and Creative Future engagement undertaken in 2017, capturing more than 16,000 voices from our community, was used to inform the development of the four themes in the MEYP.

The themes identified were:


Key Issues

Councillor Mansfield moved, Councillor Grzybek seconded -

That Council releases the draft Municipal Early Years Plan 2018-2022 for public comment for a period of four weeks.

Carried.


Attachment 1

Financial Implications

The implementation costs of some components of the plan may be the subject of consideration for future budgets. External sources of funding may also be sought.

Increased attention on the importance of reducing risk factors that have adverse implications for children, families and communities are acknowledged as providing clear social, economic and developmental benefits to the whole community.

Evidence would widely support that investment in early childhood services has a long lasting economic benefit to the community. Longitudinal studies conclude that the return on investment in providing high quality early childhood services is approximately 13% per annum through reducing the interventions required later in life.


Community Engagement

The development of the City of Greater Geelong MEYP 2018-2022 has been informed by the Clever and Creative community engagement, during which the community told us they:

Feedback was also sought on the MEYP from key internal and external stakeholders.


Social Equity Considerations

Themes such as ‘Provide accessible and inclusive services’ have been included in the MEYP and address social equity considerations by ensuring our services are accessible and inclusive of all children and their families.


Policy/Legal/Statutory Implications

Local government’s planning role is legislated in the Local Government Act 1989, Planning and Environment Act 1987 and the Health Act 1958. Corporate plans, municipal public health plans and the municipal strategic statement are required by statute. Early childhood development clearly fits within a social health framework and therefore it is intended that the MEYP is closely integrated with Council’s Municipal Public Health & Wellbeing Plan.


Alignment to Council Plan

The MEYP 2018-2022 aligns with the Council Plan. The following strategic priorities are of particular relevance:


Conflict of Interest

No officer involved in the preparation of this report has any direct or indirect interest relative to the advice provided in the report.


Risk Assessment

Council has a shared responsibility with state and federal governments to ensure locally accessible family and children’s services. This limits risk factors such as fragmentation, disadvantage, opportunities to attract funding and resources which in turn builds the capacity of the local community to adequately and effectively support families in the wellbeing of young children.

The MEYP 2018-2022 continues to enhance and strengthening local support for children and families especially in relation to improving outcomes for the most vulnerable and ensures our services are accessible and inclusive.

The MEYP provides a coherent framework within which the various issues, challenges and potential risks for children, families and local service providers can be progressively address and mitigated.


Environmental Implications

None.


[Back to List]

5. Community Zero Carbon Action Plan

Source:

City Services - Environment and Waste Services

Director:

Guy Wilson-Browne

Portfolio

Environment and Sustainability


Purpose

To seek Council endorsement of the Community Zero Carbon Action Plan.


Background

The development of the Community Zero Carbon Action Plan is a key initiative from the Zero Carbon Emissions Strategy 2017-2020. This strategy sets a strong emissions reduction target for the City’s operations based emissions; 50% by 2020 based on 2014-15 levels.

In late 2017, a stakeholder group was formed and a range of consultation activities were undertaken in developing the Community Zero Carbon Action Plan.

The City also recognises that it can play a key role in enabling positive change and reducing emissions in the community.


Key Issues

Councillor Mansfield moved, Councillor Mason seconded -

That Council endorse the Community Zero Carbon Action Plan.

Carried.


Attachment 1

Financial Implications

The main mechanism for the City to support community led actions within the Action Plan (and those that are not listed) is via the Environment and Sustainability Grants program, providing up to $6,000 for successful projects. The Environment and Sustainability grants program currently has a total funding pool of $50,000. In 2017-18 applications to the funding stream exceeded $100,000. Consideration needs to be given to increasing this funding amount to better reflect and resource community demand to undertake projects that reduce environmental impacts.


Community Engagement

Input for the Action Plan incorporates outcomes from consultation activities including:

A draft Action Plan was circulated to the Project stakeholder Group for comment – comments were incorporated into the final draft.


Social Equity Considerations

This Action Plan has brought together key community sustainability groups to agree to priority actions selected through a collaborative decision-making process. The priority actions will have community benefits including but not limited to improved health outcomes from reducing carbon emissions.


Alignment to Council Plan

The Community Zero Carbon Action Plan aligns closely with Council Plan strategic direction. An objective within this is to partner with our community to encourage sustainable design and reduce resource consumption.


Risk Assessment

As a certified One Planet Living Council, which is an internationally recognised framework to guide corporate and community environment and sustainability objectives, implementation of the Community Zero Carbon Action Plan supports the One Planet Living Program and reduces potential organisational reputational risk. The Community Zero Carbon Action Plan was also identified as a key action in the Zero Carbon Emissions Strategy 2017-2020, endorsed by Council in 2017.


Environmental Implications

Carbon emissions are a major factor in driving global climate change. The Community Zero Carbon Action Plan will assist in reducing community generated greenhouse emissions. The implementation of the Plan will also reduce air pollution resulting from the use of fossil fuels.


[Back to List]

6. Central Geelong Marketing Committee – Annual Activities Report 2017-2018 and Proposed Terms of Reference Changes

Source:

Investment & Attraction / Central Geelong & Waterfront

Director:

Brett Luxford

Portfolio

Tourism & Events and Economic Development


Purpose

To provide a report on activities undertaken by Central Geelong Marketing Committee (CGMC) 2017-2018 and to seek Council endorsement of the amended s86 Committee Terms of Reference.


Background

This report provides an overview of Central Geelong Marketing Committee (CGMC) activities for the period of 1 July 2017 to 30 June 2018.

In February 2016, Council resolved to continue the Central Geelong special rate for a further five year term until end June 2021 after consultation with Central Geelong business and property owners.

The Committee exists to market, promote and activate Central Geelong via a special rate.

The current Terms of Reference require amendment to reflect changes to stakeholder sector representative bodies.


Key Issues

Councillor Sullivan moved, Councillor Murrihy seconded -

That Council:

  1. Note the Central Geelong Marketing Committee - Annual Activities Report 2017-2018, ‘The Story Continues 2017-2018’ document (Attachment 2) and the Central Geelong Marketing Strategic Framework 2016-2021 and Annual Activities Plan 2018-2019 (Attachment 3); and

  2. Endorse the revised Terms of Reference for the Central Geelong Marketing Committee as shown in Attachment 4.

Carried.


Attachment 1

Financial Implications

The CGMC delivered the 2017-2018 Annual Activities Plan within budget.

The flagship activities of the Central Geelong Shopping Festival + Sidewalk Sales, Christmas in Central Geelong, May Magic, Tastes of Central Geelong and the Central Geelong School Holiday Fun Program bring an estimated $16.74M to Central Geelong business operators which is more than 15 times the monies generated from the special rate.

Central Geelong Marketing, through its consolidated approach, is able to leverage its program to obtain significant financial and in-kind support and bulk purchasing discounts that greatly increase the benefits obtained with the special rate funds. This is estimated at $400,000 in 2017-2018.

The recommended changes to the existing Terms of Reference have no financial implications.


Community Engagement

CGMC regularly communicates and consults with business operators via newsletters, email communications, face to face meetings and feedback from event and activity participation. CGMC undertakes regular communication and consultation with activity participants via email communications and feedback/ surveys from events and activities.

The activities and programs that result from the special rate add significantly to the vibrancy and experience of Central Geelong.

The ongoing success of Central Geelong as the ‘heart’ of the region is an essential element of broader community benefit.


Social Equity Considerations

The majority of activities delivered by Central Geelong Marketing are free and open to the general public for participation.


Policy/Legal/Statutory Implications

There are no Policy/ Legal/Statutory implications associated with this report. The CGMC as a Section 86 Committee of Council has delegated authority and decision making within its allocated budget, Terms of Reference and agreed Strategic Plan.

All activities undertaken were within the Committee’s Terms of Reference as specified by Council.


Alignment to Council Plan

The Central Geelong Marketing program is a key strategy in delivering Growing our Economy Priorities.


Conflict of Interest

This report has been prepared by the Executive Officer of the Central Geelong Marketing Committee. There are no direct or indirect conflicts of interests in matters raised in this report.


Risk Assessment

There are no significant risks associated with this report.


Environmental Implications

There are no direct environmental implications associated with the special rate program.


[Back to List]

7. Heritage Advisory Committee Updated Terms of Reference

Source:

Planning

Acting Director:

Joanne van Slageren

Portfolio

Arts, Culture and Heritage


Purpose

To endorse the updated Geelong Heritage Advisory Committee (the Committee) Terms of Reference and update the Council on the establishment and first two meetings of the Committee.


Background

Council adopted the Municipal Heritage Strategy 2017-2021 on 20 September 2017. At this time Council endorsed the establishment of a Heritage Advisory Committee.

The Committee was established as an operational committee and the terms of reference did not include councillor representation of the Committee. Since then councillor portfolios have been created. The arts, culture and heritage portfolio holder is well placed to take an active role in the Committee. A summary of the establishment of the Committee and changes to the Terms of Reference are noted in Attachment 3.


Key Issues

Councillor Murrihy moved, Councillor Sullivan seconded -

That Council:

  1. Endorse the Geelong Heritage Advisory Committee Terms of Reference (September 2018) at Attachment 2 of the report;

  2. Appoint the Arts, Culture and Heritage portfolio holder to be the chair of the Heritage Advisory Committee.

Carried.


Attachment 1

Financial Implications

There are no financial implications as a result of updating the Terms of Reference.


Community Engagement

Public notices were published to call for interested people to join the Committee. The Committee has now been appointed and has seventeen members.


Social Equity Considerations

There are no social equity considerations.


Policy/Legal/Statutory Implications

The establishment of the Committee is in accordance with the adopted Municipal Heritage Strategy and Committee Representation Council Policy.


Alignment to City Plan

Alignment to City Plan under section 6. Vibrant Arts and Culture – We treasure Geelong’s culture and heritage and will help our creative community to grow.


Conflict of Interest

No Council officers involved in the development of the Strategy and preparation of the report have a direct or indirect interest in the issue to which this report relates.


Risk Assessment

There is low risk associated with updating the Committee Terms of Reference. The establishment of the Committee has followed the Committee Representation Council Policy. The Committee provides advice to Council and the conduct of any projects would be subject to further review by officers and a future decision of Council.


Environmental Implications

There are no environmental implications with updating the Committee Terms of Reference.


Attachment 3

Summary of the Establishment of the Heritage Advisory Committee and Changes to the Terms of Reference


[Back to List]

8. Revocation of Flood-prone Area Designation of New Lots at Warralily, Stages 72, 74, 75, 113 and 118

Source:

City Services – Engineering Services

Director:

Guy Wilson- Browne

Portfolio:

Sustainable Development


Purpose

To consider revoking Council’s designation of 12 December 2006 of flood affected land Warralily, Stages 72, 74, 75, 113 and 118 as liable to flooding pursuant to Regulation 802 (2) of the Building Regulations 2006.


Background

Council has a statutory obligation under the Building Regulations 2006 to designate land as liable to flooding where it reasonably knows it to be prone to flooding. Conversely, there is an obligation to remove the encumbrance of designation from land that is no longer considered to be flood-prone.

The current designated flood mapping (refer to Attachment 2) was designated by Council at its meeting of 12 December 2006, under the provisions of the Building Regulations 2006.

The subject of this report is the residential land at Warralily fronting 70 Lake Road and 81 Lower Duneed Road, Armstrong Creek. Prior to subdivision the parent lot was used primarily as farmland.


Key Issues

Councillor Nelson moved, Councillor Murnane seconded -

That Council revoke the Council designation of 12 December 2006 of flood affected land Warralily, Stage 72, 74, 75, 113 and 118 as liable to flooding pursuant to Regulation 802(2) of the Building Regulations 2006.

Carried.


Attachment 1

Financial Implications

No impact to budget.


Community Engagement

A revocation of designation does not warrant public consultation as it constitutes the removal of an encumbrance on land.

Relevant Council databases and flood maps will be revised and updates sent to the Corangamite Catchment Management Authority and Building Control Commission.


Social Equity Considerations

Council have a responsibility to the community to provide the best possible information on areas that are flood prone.


Policy/Legal/Statutory Implications

The City has various statutory responsibilities for drainage management and flood management (prevention, response and recovery) as set out in the Local Government Act 1989, Local Government Regulations 1990, Planning and Environment Act 1987, Building Regulations 2006, Water Act 1989, Subdivision Act 1988 and Emergency Management Act 1986.


Alignment to Council Plan

The recommendations of this report are consistent with Council Plan, in relation to Growing our Economy and promoting a sustainable built environment, sustainable land use and development.


Conflict of Interest

There are no officer direct or indirect interests with respect to this report.


Risk Assessment

Council also has some risk exposure with any failure to disclose the flood-prone status of a property in a Land Information Certificate.

The revocation of the designation is the final step in minimising Council’s risk.


Environmental Implications

The revocation of flood-prone areas designation and designation of revised flood data through the design of this stage is considered unlikely to result in any known adverse environmental impacts.


Attachment 2

Current Flood Map

Current Flood Map

Attachment 3

Revised Flood Map

Revised Flood Map

[Back to List]

9. Revocation of Flood-prone Area Designation of New Lots at Armstrong Waters, Stage 5

Source:

City Services - Engineering Services

Director:

Guy Wilson-Browne

Portfolio

Social and Infrastructure Planning


Purpose

To consider revoking Council’s designation of 12 December 2006 of flood affected land Armstrong Waters Stage 5 as liable to flooding pursuant to Regulation 802 (2) of the Building Regulations 2006.


Background

Council has a statutory obligation under the Building Regulations 2006 to designate land as liable to flooding where it reasonably knows it to be prone to flooding. Conversely, there is an obligation to remove the encumbrance of designation from land that is no longer considered to be flood-prone.

The current designated flood mapping (refer to Attachment 2) was designated by Council at its meeting of 12 December 2006, under the provisions of the Building Regulations 2006.

The subject of this report is the residential land at Armstrong Waters fronting 291 – 411 Charlemont Road, Armstrong Creek. Prior to subdivision the parent lot was used primarily as farmland.


Key Issues

Councillor Nelson moved, Councillor Murnane seconded -

That Council revoke the Council designation of 12 December 2006 of flood affected land Armstrong Waters, Stage 5 as liable to flooding pursuant to Regulation 802(2) of the Building Regulations 2006.

Carried.


Attachment 1

Financial Implications

No impact to budget.


Community Engagement

A revocation of designation does not warrant public consultation as it constitutes the removal of an encumbrance on land.

Relevant Council databases and flood maps will be revised and updates sent to the Corangamite Catchment Management Authority and Building Control Commission.


Social Equity Considerations

Council have a responsibility to the community to provide the best possible information on areas that are flood prone.


Policy/Legal/Statutory Implications

The City has various statutory responsibilities for drainage management and flood management (prevention, response and recovery) as set out in the Local Government Act 1989, Local Government Regulations 1990, Planning and Environment Act 1987, Building Regulations 2006, Water Act 1989, Subdivision Act 1988 and Emergency Management Act 1986.


Alignment to Council Plan

The recommendations of this report are consistent with Council Plan, in relation to Growing our Economy and promoting a sustainable built environment, sustainable land use and development.


Conflict of Interest

There are no officer direct or indirect interests with respect to this report.


Risk Assessment

Council also has some risk exposure with any failure to disclose the flood-prone status of a property in a Land Information Certificate.

The revocation of the designation is the final step in minimising Council’s risk.


Environmental Implications

The revocation of flood-prone areas designation and designation of revised flood data through the design of this stage is considered unlikely to result in any known adverse environmental impacts.


Attachment 2

Current Flood Map

Current Flood Map

Attachment 3

Revised Flood Map

Revised Flood Map

[Back to List]

Contents | Previous Page: Section A - Procedural Matters | Next Page: Section C - Urgent Business