Contents | Previous Page: Section B - Reports | Next Page: Section D - Assembly of Councillors
Notices of Motion tabled at the Ordinary Meeting of Council on 10 December 2013 which was held at City Hall in Little Malop Street, Geelong.
The National Trust of Australia (Victoria) commissioned a report on the issue of demolition of heritage buildings by neglect entitled Demolition by Neglect - Policy on Places in the Heritage Overlay. The report aims to produce a model methodology and policies for local governments to deal with locally significant properties threatened by neglect.
The report identifies eight case studies of significant heritage buildings across the state which are considered to fall within the category of demolition by neglect. The Ritz Hotel is one of these eight case studies.
The City of Greater Geelong has had a number of Heritage buildings which have been neglected to the point of potential demolition, the most notable being the Ritz Hotel in Yarra Street. Council has attempted on numerous occasions to assist the owner of the Ritz property with ways forward to development of the site. This includes issuing and extending Planning Permits for the site over a number of years.
The report makes a number of recommendations along the following lines:
Community education
Financial Incentives for owners
Building Act Changes
Planning Scheme amendments
Council Local Laws
While any changes to Building or Planning Controls would require a state wide review, the provision of local legislative measures could be instigated for the City of Greater Geelong. Criteria which could be included in these measures are:
Weatherproofing properties
Securing properties
Maintenance and repair
Structural maintenance
The local legislations could also include penalties for failure to comply.
Cr Heagney moved, Cr S Kontelj seconded -
That Council:
investigate the applicability of certain legislative measures including the Planning Scheme, Building Act or Local Laws as a possible mechanism to increase controls over the maintenance and preservation of Heritage Significant Buildings within the Central Activity Area;
receive a report detailing the recommended processes and legislative tools by the end of February 2014.
Carried.
Division Requested:
For: Crs Ansett, Ellis, Farrell, Fisher, Harwood, Heagney, Irvine, E Kontelj, S Kontelj, Lyons, Macdonald, Nelson, Richards
Against: Nil
CHANGE 1 HOUR TIME LIMIT TO 2 HOUR TIME LIMIT
FREE SATURDAY PARKING
EXTENDED GRACE PERIOD FROM 10 MINUTES TO 15 MINUTES
The Central Geelong Task Force has been developing an action plan to deliver a revitalised and thriving central Geelong. One of the issues investigated is that of convenient access to Central Geelong. The resulting action plan (to come to council in January 2014) has identified opportunities to improve the experience of visitation by car. Rather than wait for the full Action plan to be endorsed by council it is proposed to pull forward the following 3 trial initiatives. These trials aim to inform a possible broader suite of improvements that the council will be able to consider as part of the 14/15 budget process.
Councillors at times receive comments from residents, shoppers and some shopkeepers about the existence of 1 hour parking limits being too restrictive and not user friendly for those who choose to come into the Central Geelong for their business and shopping needs. It is felt that by increasing this time limit to 2 hours, customers have adequate time to do their business and will have a positive customer experience. An exception to this rule will be around the emergency entrance of the Geelong Hospital which will have the 1 hour zones maintained to provide turnover and enable emergency access.
In addition, there has been ongoing comment in the community about the fee that is charged to park in Central Geelong. Some people have an opinion that introducing free parking on Saturday will provide incentive for more visitors to the Central Geelong area. It is proposed that Saturday parking be made free of charge for a trial period to determine if more visitors are enticed to Central Geelong.
At times Council receives complaints from residents, shoppers and some shopkeepers who have being infringed for parking marginally longer than the permitted time period, including the grace period. It is felt that by extending the existing grace period from 10 minutes to 15 minutes, customers have a greater opportunity to return to their vehicle on time, thereby avoiding a fine.
It is estimated that there will be a loss of revenue to Council of approximately $212,000 in machine revenue and fines and an increase in expenditure of approximately $18,000 for sign replacement, machine tariff changes and resources to measure the effectiveness of such changes. As a result, operational savings will need to be found to cover the costs of implementation and reduced income.
Cr Heagney moved, Cr Farrell seconded -
That Council, for a trial period between January 1 and March 31, 2014
increase all current Central Geelong 1 hour parking limits to 2 hours except for those areas adjacent to the emergency sections of the Geelong Hospital;
extend and publicise the grace period to 15 minutes free on top of the purchased ticket or signed time allowance;
trial free Saturday parking;
establish a feedback process, 2 months into the trial, through the Central Geelong Place Management Unit to consult with customers, businesses and key agencies such as the Chamber of Commerce and Central Geelong Marketing on the effectiveness and impacts of the changes. A report is to be brought back to Council detailing the outcomes of the trial.
AMENDMENT
Cr Ansett moved, Cr Irvine seconded -
That:
Council, for a trial period between January 1 and March 31, 2014
increase all current Central Geelong 1 hour parking limits to 2 hours except for those areas adjacent to the emergency sections of the Geelong Hospital;
extend and publicise the grace period to 15 minutes free on top of the purchased ticket or signed time allowance;
trial free Saturday parking;
establish a feedback process, 2 months into the trial, through the Central Geelong Place Management Unit to consult with customers, businesses and key agencies such as the Chamber of Commerce and Central Geelong Marketing on the effectiveness and impacts of the changes. A report is to be brought back to Council detailing the outcomes of the trial.
the proposed reduction in expenditure will occur in the following areas:
$20k - reduction in indirect staff costs – Local Laws;
$30k - conclusion of mosquito control season at end of February;
$15k - overtime savings associated with Saturday parking patrols;
$ 5k - reduction in call out costs for animal related issues;
$20k - reduction of marketing collateral and patrol costs associated with the launch Domestic Animal Management Plan;
$75k - Hard waste initiatives expenditure lower than budget;
$50k - HACC Hard waste support – actual costs trending lower than budget;
$10k - Tree planting and aftercare savings.
$225k Total Potential Savings.
Carried.
AMENDMENT
Cr Farrell moved, Cr Nelson seconded -
That:
Council, for a trial period between January 1 and March 31, 2014
increase all current Central Geelong 1 hour parking limits to 2 hours except for those areas adjacent to the emergency sections of the Geelong Hospital;
extend and publicise the grace period to 15 minutes free on top of the purchased ticket or signed time allowance;
trial free Saturday parking;
establish a feedback process, 2 months into the trial, through the Central Geelong Place Management Unit to consult with customers, businesses and key agencies such as the Chamber of Commerce and Central Geelong Marketing on the effectiveness and impacts of the changes. A report is to be brought back to Council detailing the outcomes of the trial.
the proposed reduction in expenditure will occur in the following areas:
$20k - reduction in indirect staff costs – Local Laws;
$ 8k - conclusion of mosquito control season at end of February;
$15k - overtime savings associated with Saturday parking patrols;
$ 5k - reduction in call out costs for animal related issues;
$20k - reduction of marketing collateral and patrol costs associated with the launch Domestic Animal Management Plan;
$75k - Hard waste initiatives expenditure lower than budget;
$50k - HACC Hard waste support – actual costs trending lower than budget;
$10k - Tree planting and aftercare savings.
$22k – Committee for Geelong Membership Savings.
$225k Total Potential Savings
FORMAL MOTION
Cr Richards moves, Cr S Kontelj seconded –
That the amendment be put.
Carried.
The amendment was put and carried.
The amendment became the motion.
The motion was put and carried.
Contents | Previous Page: Section B - Reports | Next Page: Section D - Assembly of Councillors