Council Minutes - Section B: Reports (6-10) - 27 May 2014

Contents | Previous Page: Section B - Reports (3-5) | Next Page: Section B - Reports (11-12)

Reports tabled at the Ordinary Meeting of Council on Tuesday date held at the Geelong Greyhound Racing Club, Princes Freeway, Corio.


  1. Leopold Integrated Children’s Centre

  2. ANZAC Centenary

  3. Geelong Playgroup Week 2014

  4. Funding Agreement – Geelong Centre for Emerging Infectious Diseases (GCEID) – Construction of Research Hub

  5. City Plan 2013-2017 Progress Report to March 2014



6. Leopold Integrated Children’s Centre

Portfolio:

Community Development - Cr Fisher

Source:

Community Services

General Manager:

Jenny McMahon

Index Reference:

Subject: Community Building / Early Years
Project: Leopold Integrated Children’s Centre


Purpose

The purpose of this report is to present recommendations to Council for the future governance and operational arrangements for the new Leopold Integrated Children’s Centre.


Summary

Cr Macdonald moved, Cr Fisher seconded

That Council directly manage the Leopold Integrated Children’s Centre.


Carried.

Background

The development of the Leopold Integrated Children’s Centre has been designed to augment the limited capacity of existing local services to meet rapidly growing population requirements in Leopold and surrounding areas on the Bellarine, while also expanding the range of programs and services available for local children and families. It will also increase childcare service options for commuter populations from Ocean Grove, Drysdale/Clifton Springs and the wider Bellarine Peninsula.

The second stage of proposed development at the site includes a new public library and spaces for youth services. This will provide additional opportunities in the future for the integration of learning, training and support programs for adults, young people and children (e.g. early literacy programs, support programs for young parents).

The key feature of an ‘integrated children’s centre’ is that it acts as a service hub for the community by bringing together a range of services and practitioners (from a range of professional backgrounds) who use a holistic, integrated approach to supporting children and their families.   

The integration of early childhood services and the increased collaboration between services and other professionals are integral to addressing and supporting the needs of children and their families. Local, national and international evidence clearly identifies a range of positive outcomes for children and families where services adopt a more integrated and holistic approach.

The Boorai Centre Ocean Grove commenced operation at full service capacity in January 2014 and has already begun to establish a new benchmark in the delivery of integrated early childhood services in the City of Greater Geelong. Specifically, a centralised management structure with Council as the lead agency has enabled the centre to develop an integrated practice model that incorporates:-

The development of the Leopold Integrated Children’s Centre will build upon and extend the City’s new, integrated approach to the provision of quality children’s services within the Leopold community. The Leopold Integrated Children’s Centre is of a similar size and service complexity to the Boorai Centre.

A range of potential governance and management options for the operation of the new Leopold Integrated Children’s Centre have been examined (refer Attachment 1). Consequently, this report proposes that the City of Greater Geelong assumes the role as the lead agency in the development of the governance and management of the Leopold Integrated Children’s Centre.

Council is a registered kindergarten cluster manager and currently operates the Maternal and Child Health service that will be incorporated into the new Leopold Integrated Children’s Centre. Council has also demonstrated its capacity to successfully operate an integrated children’s centre of similar size and service complexity in Ocean Grove.


Discussion

The Leopold Integrated Children’s Centre has been designed to provide an integrated early childhood service, that delivers a comprehensive range of early childhood education and care services for the growing community of Leopold and the surrounding area.

The location of the new Leopold Integrated Children’s Centre provides a key focal point for the local community, and opportunity for close integration and linkages with other education, community, and recreation services and amenities. The completion of Stage 2 development at the site will also result in the co-location of the Centre with a new public library and specialist youth services. To date, evidence from the implementation of the Boorai Centre indicates that the location of integrated children’s centres within close proximity to primary schools and recreation reserves not only enhances the quality of educational experiences available to children across all early years services but also creates professional linkages and shared understandings that support children’s transitions between learning environments.

The principles on which the new Leopold Integrated Children’s Centre has been developed reflect a shared commitment to improving outcomes for children and families, and a belief that greater progress toward improved outcomes is to be achieved by services working together rather than working in isolation.

The proposed integrated service model for the new Leopold Integrated Children’s Centre is consistent with that currently adopted at the Boorai Centre. This model also aligns with national, state and local government policy and program directions aimed at improving integration and co-location of early childhood services, and strengthening connections between early childhood services and facilities provided by other government and community agencies.

A comprehensive literature review undertaken by the Centre for Community Child Health (CCCH) outlines a number of features of effective integrated child and family services that have been identified.  These include the following:

Although still in its early stages of establishment, the Boorai Centre has already demonstrated that integrated service delivery creates opportunities for the delivery of education and care services to children that is supported by ‘wrap around’ parenting support (e.g. parenting information sessions, counselling sessions). This results in consistency across home and service environments in terms of how children’s learning and development needs are met, as well as ensuring that the ‘background factors’ within families (e.g. parental separation) that can impact upon children’s development are addressed within a supportive environment. Multi-disciplinary professional consultations, assessments and planning also regularly occur within the Boorai Centre, enabling a holistic response to identifying and meeting children’s needs.

This new model is more than simply ‘co-locating’ a range of services together under ‘one roof’. The experience of the Boorai Centre indicates that co-location in itself does not lead to ‘integration’ or for that matter even improved ‘cooperation’. Evidence from the experience of implementing this new centre in Ocean Grove indicates that more is required, and must include every aspect from how a centre is governed, managed, and the ways in which services are delivered.

The scope and design of the new Leopold Integrated Children’s Centre will significantly expand the capacity of existing education and care service provision for young children within the Leopold community. Current provision will be further enhanced through the development of a range of new and additional services including playgroups, parent education, toy library, family support services, early intervention, and ancillary community health. These new service activities and programs will be designed in consultation with children and their families so that they meet the current and emerging needs of families.

The Leopold Integrated Children’s Centre will also provide a focal point for local placed-based access to information and referral to a range of services provided more generally throughout the municipality and by other providers including government agencies. This function of the centre will also include administrative function to assist parents with appointments, enrolments and program registrations. In providing a place-based response to children and families, parents who are new to the local area will  also able to access opportunities to establish informal social support networks (e.g. through attendance at playgroups or being provided with information about other community services), thereby reducing social isolation and the risk of social exclusion.

Program and service planning will aim to ensure that opportunities for outreach and home visiting services are provided to families – taking services to families, rather than expecting families to come to the centre, will be, in some cases, the only way to engage families and ensure positive benefits are provided to young children. The service will also ensure that culturally safe and inclusive practices are integral to the centre’s philosophy and mode of operation.

Governance:

The concept of integrated governance and service delivery has gained wide-spread currency in the field of early childhood service provision and related government policy. This has been particularly driven by the design and development of new models of children’s service infrastructure that provide a ‘one-stop-shop’ delivery of a range of services that may have been formerly located and delivered through geographically isolated and separate service centres and governance arrangements.

Studies of integrated governance initiatives both in Australia and overseas all point to the importance of strong executive leadership at the top of relevant organisations in order to achieve desirable outcomes and overcome the myriad of potential barriers and challenge that are commonly associated with achieving integration.

The work undertaken by the Centre for Community Child Health in the ‘Evaluation of Victorian children’s centres: Framework to support the establishment and operation of children’s centres’ established a number of indicators of a governance structure that is able to effectively manage and operate an integrated early childhood service and that has a clear community mandate. These include:-

The effectiveness and speed with which these aspects of service governance have been able to be implemented at the Boorai Centre has been a direct result of the unified, centralised governance structure that has resulted from the centre being a Council managed service. The positive impact of this structure is evidenced by the following achievements:-

This experience indicates that integrated children’s centres will, therefore, benefit from Council’s strong strategic planning foundations that are well aligned with key objectives associated with achieving integrated service development within early childhood services and approaches to broader local community building and social planning prioities. Council also has well developed, robust and transparent governance, management, financial and reporting systems that are subject to public scrutiny and internal and external checks and balances.

In addition to its management of the City’s first integrated children’s centre, Council has successfully delivered related early childhood services and programs over a long period and has strong community confidence and support. Council has an intimate knowledge and understanding of local needs and priorities, along with the capacity to focus both knowledge and resources to address identified local needs and priorities.

As the lead agency for the Leopold Integrated Children’s Centre, Council will be responsible for ensuring that services and activities are delivered in accordance with key objectives and community requirements, including financial accountability, quality of provision, integrated services and management, as well as meeting the targets set out in performance management frameworks and individual service contracts. In addition to this, regular consultation with the local community, parents and partners will ensure local needs are met and resources are used effectively.

Parents, user groups, community organisations and other key stakeholders will be encouraged to participate in the operational and functional dimensions of the Leopold Integrated Children’s Centre, through the establishment of a ‘Centre Advisory Group’. This group will focus on the development and evaluation of the relationships, policies, planning and procedures that will ensure the effective development and implementation of an effective, integrated practice model and governance structure at the centre. Refer to the diagram presented in Attachment 2 for a summary of the proposed management structure of the Leopold Integrated Children’s Centre. This structure has been successfully implemented at the Boorai Centre, with parent participation a key component of the functioning of the advisory group.

Staffing:

Once completed and operating at full capacity, the new centre will employ 35 full time equivalent staff.  The increased net cost to Council for the first year as detailed in the table on page 7 has been included in the draft 2014/2015 budget.  It is anticipated that by 2016/2017 the budget for the long day care and kindergarten programs will achieve a cost neutral position.


Environmental Implications

The Leopold Integrated Children’s Centre meets the requirements of the Building Code of Australia.


Financial Implications

As indicated in Table 1 (below), it is expected that the Leopold Integrated Children’s Centre will generate income of approximately $0.25M in 2014-15 in its initial three months of operation, increasing to $1.82M in 2015-16 and to $2.46M in 2016-17. The projected income estimates have been conservatively calculated, based on an initial 44 places in the long daycare service (at 95 per cent utilisation) in its first three months of operation and increasing to full capacity (i.e. 92 places at 95 per cent utilisation) by 2016-17.

 It is anticipated that the sessional kindergarten program will commence operation at the centre from 2016. The maternal and children health service will continue to be funded in accordance with existing arrangements.

 

Income

Expenditure

Cost to Council
(incl. MCH)

Cost to Council
(excl. MCH)

2014-15
(3 months)

$0.25M

$0.38M

$0.14M

$0.10M

2015-16

$1.82M

$2.10M

$0.28M

$0.16M

2016-17

$2.46M

$2.58M

$0.13M

$0.00M

Table 1: Estimated Annual Budget for Leopold Integrated Children’s Centre (excluding depreciation and maintenance)

Total consolidated expenditure across all Council programs and services operating from the Leopold Integrated Children’s Centre is expected to be $0.38M in the initial three month financial year period 2014-15, increasing to $2.1M in 2015-16 and to $2.59M in 2016-17.

The additional costs to Council (subtracting the costs for which Council already contributes to the existing maternal and child health service) is expected to be $0.10M in 2014-5 and $0.16M in 2015-16.

The annual percentage rate at which the cost to Council will be reduced from the period of commencement remains subject to how quickly the centre achieves optimal utilisation, and also maintaining an annual fees adjustment at the rate of 4.5 per cent.

Based upon current predicted service demand, however, it is estimated that the service will be operating at full capacity by 2016-17, at which point the budget for the long day care and kindergarten programs will achieve a cost neutral position.

International economic research clearly demonstrates that the cost-benefit return on public investment in high quality childhood education is substantial. Equally, providing the infrastructure so that all adults who wish or need to work outside the home can find and sustain employment is critical to meeting workforce demands to sustain an economically competitive region.


Policy/Legal/Statutory Implications

The planning role of Local Government in relation to the provision of services for the community is legislated in the Victorian Local Government Act (1989), Planning and Environment Act (1987) and the Health Act (1958).

The provision of early childhood facilities and delivery of related services is regulated by a range of legislated requirements and service standards including the following:


Alignment to City Plan

The development of the Leopold Integrated Children’s Centre aligns with a range of existing Council strategies, policies and plans that inform Council’s role in the provision of children’s services and facilities. These include:


Officer Direct or Indirect Interest

No officers or contractors involved in the preparation of this report have a direct or indirect interest in matters to which this report relates.


Risk Assessment

There are a number of inherent risks with a project of this nature. These risks are being mitigated through various control measures, and include financial, operational, and potential implications for Council’s reputation.


Social Considerations

There are a number of pressures on Council relating to the provision of family and children’s services in the Leopold area which will be addressed by completion of this project. In significantly increasing the provision of affordable childcare within the local community, the centre will also contribute to broader social and economic outcomes for families in the local area.

The Leopold Integrated Children’s Centre represents a significant investment of public funding and is a key part of the broader establishment of a new benchmark and service model for the delivery of integrated children’s services across the City. This commitment to integrated children’s centres will continue to ensure that earlier, ‘whole of family’ intervention and support for children can occur for children within their local community.

It is therefore essential to ensure that governance and management structures facilitate and support the successful implementation and achievement of the goals for this project, as well building upon the learning to date from the operation of the new Boorai Centre.


Human Rights Charter

The United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child (CRC) requires governments to take all appropriate measures to ... render appropriate assistance to parents and legal guardians in the performance of their child-rearing responsibilities.

The United Nations CRC in conjunction with the Human Rights Charter upholds the rights of children’s rights to receive appropriate support and assistance, which protects their welfare, health, and well-being.


Consultation and Communication

Council has been working closely with relevant stakeholder groups, and communicating with the Leopold community in regards to this project.


Attachment 1: Governance Options Matrix

The following summarises a range of potential options under which integrated children’s centre could be managed. Not all the options referred to in this table would necessarily result in successfully achieving effective integrated outcomes or governance.

Model Structure

Description

Example

Advantages

Disadvantages

Preferred Option Rating

Direct Council Service Management

Council would assume responsibility for governance and management.

Service users, sub-contractors, and parents would have input through ‘advisory groups’ and sub-committees.

Currently Council directly manages 1 integrated children’s centre, 7 long day care centres and 4 kindergarten programs.

Council is also responsible for the direct management of the existing MCH service.

Provides clear and cohesive governance.

High level of credibility and community support.

Statutory framework and accountability.

Strong management and established support systems

Direct control over quality and service management.

Capacity to sub-contract as required.

Large flexible workforce.

History of sound business management.

Driven by non commercial community interests.

Maintains mix economy of local service provision.

Ensure cohesion between property and service management.

Would not require redeployment, transfer, or redundancy of existing workforce.

Imposes additional responsibility on Council.

Increases Council’s liabilities and potential short term costs.

Limits direct community involvement in service management.

1

Establishment of new Incorporated Association

Requires the establishment of a separate legal entity, incorporated association or a limited liability company that CSOs can also become members of.

This model increases the accountability of members to each other and legally — either through the Associations Incorporation Act 1981 or the Corporations Act 2001.

This structure can provide for contracts to be entered into, property and employment of staff.

Increased burden of responsibility for ‘committee or Board’ members, including ensuring compliance with all necessary legal requirements and liabilities.

Neighbourhood houses and kindergartens generally operate on this model.

Removes one control of Council or one CSO (lead CSO) as fund holder.

Defrays costs and liabilities from Council and individual CSOs.

Stronger reporting lines for funded positions and staff to a BOM.

Stronger lines of reporting and financial accountability.

In-kind support and real costs of partnership are exposed.

Encourages community ownership and participation.

Supports broader range of organisational interests.

Provides opportunities for building social capital within local community.

Burden of responsibility focused on members of COM or BOM.

Increased reporting and administrative duties for COM and BOM.

Increasing difficulty recruiting skilled COM with sufficient skills and capacity.

Enters a competitive space as corporate body.

Can be subject to individual interests and completing priorities

Lack of continuity for strategic planning.

Could not assume capacity of all service components e.g. MCH.

Would require redeployment of existing staff or subcontract arrangement back to Council.

Does not eliminate Council liabilities and potential short term costs.

Council remains responsible to ensure delivery of quality requirements.

2

Contract Lead Agency or Multi-agency Agreement

This model would provide for the opportunity to ‘out source’ the governance and management of the centre and service delivery to an established independent provider or consortium of providers.

Would possibly require implementation of a tender process to select preferred provider/providers.

Vines Road; Geelong Family Relationships Centre

Reduced liability and costs for Council.

Clearly defined lines of reporting and accountability.

Control over quality and service management subject to contract arrangements.

Would possible still require financial maintenance arrangements for Council to compensate for any shortfall in funding.

Arrangement would be subject to selective tender process.

Favours larger well resourced organisations – dominant providers

Domination by single provider over other smaller services.

Reduced community and Council involvement.

Diminished control by Council over service quality and management.

Reduced local influence on operation of centre.

Smaller groups and organisations may have difficulty in negotiating access or be subject to unreasonable costs.

Integration requirements are likely to be subject to other financial and operational priorities.

Would require redeployment of existing staff or subcontract arrangement back to Council.

Does not eliminate Council liabilities and potential short term costs.

Council remains responsible to ensure delivery of quality requirements.

3



Attachment 2: Proposed Management Structure

Proposed Management Structure

[Back to Top]

7. ANZAC Centenary

Portfolio:

Heritage - Cr Ansett

Source:

Community Services/Arts & Culture

General Manager:

Jenny McMahon

Index Reference:

Subject: Anzac Centenary


Purpose

The purpose of this report is to inform Council of Anzac Centenary funding programs being offered by Federal and State Governments and projects which have been submitted for funding.


Summary

Cr Macdonald moved, Cr Ansett seconded -

That Council note the commemorative Anzac Centenary projects being submitted under grant programmes being offered by the Federal and Victorian State Governments.


Carried.

Background

The Centenary of Australia’s involvement in WW1 will be commemorated in many different ways across the nation.  A number of War Memorials and Avenues of Honour are located throughout the City of Greater Geelong including the Geelong Peace Memorial in Johnstone Park.

To support the Anzac Centenary, Federal and State Governments have created programmes to provide Councils and communities with access to funding for Anzac Centenary projects. 

The grant programmes include:


Discussion

Possible Anzac Centenary projects, including collaborative project opportunities have been discussed with representatives of local service organisations including the Geelong RSL Sub Branch and the Geelong and District Sub Branch of the National Serviceman’s Association.

A consolidated list of proposed Anzac Centenary projects has been developed and assessed against programme funding criteria from the various Federal and State Government programmes.  Some programmes offered have extended time-frames which will enable further development of concepts.  Current projects include:


Environmental Implications

There are no environmental implications associated with this report.


Financial Implications

There is no allocation in the draft 2014/2015 Council budget.  Projects will not take place unless successful in receiving grant funding from Federal and/or State Government Anzac Centenary programmes.

Ongoing maintenance costs for projects which involve the creation of a new and/or upgraded asset such as a memorial or public art piece will require maintenance plans for care under Council’s Public Art Maintenance budget.


Policy/Legal/Statutory Implications

There is no policy, legal or statutory implications in this report.


Alignment to City Plan

Anzac Centenary projects align with Community Wellbeing – Connected, creative and strong communities: Healthy lifestyles: Healthy environments and Growing our Economy: Greater Geelong is a leading city for tourism, arts, culture and events.


Officer Direct or Indirect Interest

There is no officer direct or indirect interest in this project. 


Risk Assessment

It is important to seek opportunities to mark the Anzac Centenary given the civic pride associated with the actions performed by Geelong people in WW1.

Projects will be implemented using Council’s Risk Management framework. 


Social Considerations

Between 1914 and 1918, the nation of Australia was at war and the Anzac Centenary is a milestone of special significance to all Australians. The First World War helped define us as a people and as a nation and during the Centenary period, Australia will remember the original Anzacs who served at Gallipoli and the Western Front, those people who served on the home front and also commemorate more than a century of service by Australian men and women in defence service roles.

The active involvement and sacrifice made by members of the Geelong community in WW1 was significant. Commemoration of local involvement in various forms will strengthen the current Geelong community’s knowledge and understanding of the depth of sacrifice made 100 years ago.  The Anzac story is a powerful one and the commemorations of the centenary of WW1 will provide Council with a unique opportunity to collaborate with community groups and individuals, on projects to mark this chapter in Australian history at a local level.


Human Rights Charter

Rights that will be supported in evaluation and implementation of any Anzac Centenary projects will include;


Consultation and Communication

The Arts & Culture Department in consultation with Communication and Marketing will be responsible for communicating this report.


[Back to Top]

8. Geelong Playgroup Week 2014

Portfolio:

Community Development – Cr Fisher

Source:

Community Services – Family Services

General Manager:

Jenny McMahon

Index Reference:

Subject: Children’s Events


Purpose

The purpose of this report is to present to Council the outcomes of the 2014 Geelong Playgroup Week celebrations, held between 24-30 March 2014.


Summary

Cr Fisher moved, Cr Heagney seconded -

That Council acknowledges the success of Playgroup Week in Geelong, March 2014, and the contribution by volunteers and local organisations.


Carried.


Background

Playgroup Week events commenced in Geelong in 2008 with the DEECD funded Supported Playgroups and Parenting program promoting a get together of facilitated and community playgroups at Eastern Gardens. This event was attended by       approximately 180 parents and children and from this small beginning has grown over the last 7 years to more broadly service the needs of families with infants, toddlers and preschool children. This event now has in excess of 800 parents and children in attendance. From 2012 Playgroup Week has also been celebrated at Steampacket Gardens/Carousel, building on successful annual Children’s Week celebrations held in October each year.

Playgroup Week in Geelong has continued to grow strongly, and provide enhanced opportunities to encourage children’s civic participation and the promotion of the unique contributions children make to the local community.


Discussion

Geelong’s Playgroup Week program represents one of the largest regional events in Playgroup Week in Victoria.  Its success is evidenced by strong participation from local children and families during the week.

Playgroup Week generates significant good will and is a low cost event facilitated by the Family Services Department with involvement of community organisations. The cost of Playgroup Week activities is absorbed within existing program budgets.


Environmental Implications

All events and activities conducted during Playgroup Week attempt to promote and operate according to good environmental sustainability practices and principles, including appropriate waste management and recycling wherever possible. Activities for children include “pop up play” with a focus on using recycled objects including cardboard boxes for creative play.


Financial Implications

All costs associated with the Playgroup Week activities were met within the budget allocation of $12,500.


Policy/Legal/Statutory Implications

Council’s role in supporting the provision of local programs and activities for children and families is consistent with local government requirements stipulated under Section 3E (a); (b); (c); and (d) of the Victorian Local Government Act 1989 and also the Victorian Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities.

Council’s role and responsibilities toward the hosting and support of Playgroup Week are consistent with key recommendations endorsed by Council in the existing Municipal Health and Wellbeing Plan 2013-17, including priorities of physical active communities, social inclusion and community connectedness.


Alignment to City Plan

Council’s City Plan 2013–17 details corporate planning objectives, service delivery priorities and commitments that are consistent with and closely aligned to the matters contained in this report, especially in relation to the development and provision of opportunities to facilitate community participation and engagement and healthy environments.


Officer Direct or Indirect Interest

No officers or contractors involved in the preparation of this report have a direct or indirect interest in matters to which this report relates.


Risk Assessment

Risk assessment planning is routinely completed for all Council hosted events in accordance with Council event planning guidelines.


Social Considerations

Children’s active engagement and participation in their community has significant social and developmental benefits that are shared by children, families, and the whole community.

Playgroup Week provides a unique opportunity to promote civic participation by young children and acknowledge the contributions provided by children toward realising the Council vision of making ‘Geelong a great place to live’.

Growth in participation in Playgroup Week by a diverse range of organisations and community groups (including Geelong Regional Library, TAFE, schools, family support agencies, playgroups, Botanic Gardens and toy libraries) provides a positive platform for partnership and generation of community goodwill.


Human Rights Charter

Council’s role in supporting the provision of local programs and activities for children and families is consistent with the Victorian Charter of Human rights and Responsibilities, Part 2 Section 17 Protection of families and children.


Consultation and Communication

Geelong’s Playgroup Week 2014 was advertised on Playgroup Victoria website, Geelong Early Childhood and Education eBulletin, DEECD Children’s Week website, the Geelong Australia website and social media were also used to promote Children’s Week.

An event flyer was developed and distributed both in electronic format and posted to schools, Maternal and Child Centre centres, the Carousel, child care centres, kindergartens, playgroups, toy libraries, family day care educators and families, Geelong libraries, Playgroup Victoria, CAOS Newsletter, registered organisations, Bellarine Kids & Geelong Kids websites and Council Customer Services Centres in the Geelong and surrounding areas. Kids Voice magazine promoted the event in their What’s On section.

The event was posted on the Geelong Australia Facebook page with over 800 viewings and Event Geelong Facebook page that had 668 viewings on Friday 21 March, 419 viewings on Sunday 23 March, 411 viewings on Monday 24 March and 2,763 viewings of the event in action on Monday 24 March.  Media notifications and releases were forwarded to COGG Media for distribution through local media outlets. Additional advertising was placed in City News in the Geelong Advertiser and Geelong Independent Newspapers in the week leading up to the event. 

The communication of this report along with material produced in relation to the development and promotion of Playgroup Week in Geelong is the responsibility of Council’s Family Services Department.


Attachment 1

Page 1

Feedback summary and event photos

Participant feedback surveys were completed using android tablets. The surveys were loaded onto the tablets as an offline link and allowed surveyors to roam and engage with participants.

Steampacket Gardens and Carousel event Monday 24th March, 10.00 am  to 12.00 pm

Image 1 showing participants enjoying activitiesImage 2 showing participants busy with activities


Eastern Gardens event Wednesday 26th March 10.00 am to 1.00 pm

At this event as well as interviewing adults about their experience, children were surveyed through a photo board activity. This was a huge success and at future children’s events children’s voices will continue to be included in evaluation to inform forward planning.

Image 1 at Eastern Gardens event Image 2 at Eastern Gardens event


[Back to Top]

9. Funding Agreement – Geelong Centre for Emerging Infectious Diseases (GCEID) – Construction of Research Hub

Portfolio:

Enterprise Geelong – Cr Harwood

Source:

Enterprise Geelong

General Manager:

Dr Russell Walker

Index Reference:

Project: Geelong Centre for Emerging Infectious Diseases (GCEID)


Purpose

This report seeks to facilitate the GCEID – Construction of Research Hub Project by Council authorising the Acting Chief Executive Officer to sign a funding agreement, with the Australian Government, to auspice up to $3million funding, to facilitate delivery of the project.


Summary

Cr Harwood moved, Cr Macdonald seconded -

That Council resolve to authorise the Acting Chief Executive Officer to sign the Funding Agreement - CDG239 Geelong Centre for Emerging Infectious Diseases – Construction of Research Hub Project.

Carried.


Background

Council has previously unsuccessfully attempted to action an agreement with the Australian Government for funding for this project under the previous government’s Regional Development Australia Fund (RDAF).

This agreement is the result of the new Government’s’ Community Development Grants Programme Manager “approving re-opening negotiations to establish a Funding Agreement with the City of Greater Geelong for the construction of a Research Hub for Emerging Infectious Diseases.”- Australian Government Correspondence to Council.

Harwood Andrews are Council’s legal advisors in this matter, and have prepared a contract between COGG and Barwon Health to pass on many of the obligations of this agreement to Barwon Health – the building owners.  Barwon Health is fully aware of this agreement and the obligations therein and has agreed to proceed.

After four months of contract negotiation Council are now at final agreement stage with the Australian Government and required to return the signed agreement before the 4th June 2014.

The intention of this agreement is to ensure that the Australian Government pass on all responsibility and accountability for the careful management and delivery of this project to Council.

The financial project partners and the independent project manager are all members of the GCEID Project Control Group (PCG) This PCG has met four times in 2014, an independent project manager has been appointed, COGG has been involved in a risk assessment process for this project along with the other project partners.


Discussion

The recommendation in this report is informed by a range of key professionals – including close scrutiny of the proposed deliverables by Barwon Health’s Business Manager and Financial Officer, Barwon Health’s Capital Works Manager, the experienced independent project manager appointed to the project, Council Officers, and independent legal advice.

Environmental Implications

There are no environmental implications.


Financial Implications

Council have already committed $100,000 in the next budget cycle to fund the GCEID Construction of a Research Hub Project.  All of these monies are allocated within the overall GCEID construction budget.

  1.  Income:                  Up to $3,000,000

  2. Expenditure:            Up to $3,100,000 (including Council commitment)

  3. Ongoing maintenance and operational costs:

    1. Legal estimated $7,000

    2. Staffing 0.2 EFT PCG, Contract and Project Quality Assurance. To December 2015 – with an ongoing five year commitment to ensure the intention of the GCEID project on this site is realised. 


Policy/Legal/Statutory Implications

Council are subject to the terms and conditions of the Australian Government Department of Infrastructure and Regional development Community Development Grants Programme Funding Agreement in relation to the Geelong Centre for Emerging Infectious Diseases – Construction of Research Hub.


Alignment to City Plan

GCEID is listed as Priority Project in the G21 2013 Report to the Region,

Council’s Annual Report 2012-2013 refers to GCEID as an all of government collaboration with the private sector to protect population health, food safety and food security. 


Officer Direct or Indirect Interest

There are no known conflicts of interest.


Risk Assessment

If Council do not authorise the Acting Chief Executive Officer to sign this funding agreement the Geelong Centre for Emerging Infectious Diseases – Construction of Research Hub Project funding will not proceed and the reputation of the Council’s ability to action a funding agreement will be severely tarnished.  The project has already been halted once before and taking the negative course of action in this case will have unnecessarily cost both Barwon Health and Deakin University a great deal of money time and resources.

Delivering this project may have challenges such as seeking statutory authority within the agreed time frames

The economic impact of an infectious disease outbreak can be catastrophic - GCEID is a critical part of our offensive and defensive capability for both our animal industries and the risk to human health in the Barwon South West and across Australia.


Social Considerations

The Geelong Centre for Emerging Infectious Diseases project has the potential not only to protect and grow the Barwon South West regional economy but also has national impact and significance.  GCEID has obvious economic benefits stimulating employment during construction phase, and Geelong’s Centre for Emerging Infectious Diseases will help protect the health of our communities and the productivity of our livestock.

An Independent assessment by economists indicates that GCEID will inject $29.7 million into the regional economy in the sort term and create 137 jobs.  GCEID is expected to deliver $87 million of benefits to the region over the first 20 years of operation.

Increasing emerging Infectious disease research activity and the profile of GCEID in the region has the potential to stimulate local commercial opportunities associated with this research. 


Human Rights Charter

Human health is increasingly threatened by current and emerging infectious diseases and GCEID will deliver new and innovative ways to better manage these.


Consultation and Communication

GCEID is a collaborative, multi-disciplinary health initiative and the construction phase is critical to allow the GCEID to grow and evolve the planned outputs, providing a central location for the integration of research activities of the three partner research organisations.  Delivering the Construction of the Research hub project involves a collaborative working relationship with Barwon Health, the City of Greater Geelong and Deakin University.


[Back to Top]

10. City Plan 2013-2017 Progress Report to March 2014

Portfolio:

Governance –  Cr Lyons (Mayor)

Source:

Corporate Services - Corporate Strategy

A/General Manager:

Michael Kelly

Index Reference:

Corporate Management


Purpose

Council at its meeting on 25 June 2013 adopted City Plan 2013-2017, that outlined the Strategic Directions and Priorities planned by the City over that four-year period, and the Annual Business Plan Actions planned for 2013-2014.

This report is the progress report to Council of the organisations achievements against these actions.


Summary

Cr E Kontelj moved, Cr S Kontelj seconded -

That Council receives and notes the City Plan Progress Report to 31 March 2014.

Carried.

Background

That Council at its meeting on 25 June 2013 adopted City Plan 2013-2017, which has been developed within a framework of four strategic directions:

Community Wellbeing

Healthy Together Geelong: to enhance health, wellbeing and quality of life of Greater Geelong Communities.

Growing Our Economy

Securing Geelong’s economic future

A Sustainable Built and Natural Environment

Partnering with our community to protect and enhance our natural ecosystems and to encourage sustainable design and reduced resource consumption.

How We Do Business

We will focus on developing and maintaining effective working relationships to deliver Council’s strategic directions and cost effective services that meet the changing needs of the community.


Discussion

This report and attachment indicates the status of the actions in City Plan 2013-2017 for the 2013-2014 financial year as at 31 March, 2014.

The attachment provides status and comments for each of the 258 actions within the four strategic directions.

There has been significant progress towards achieving the actions in 2013-2014 including:

Community Wellbeing

Status Summary:

On Schedule:    111      Completed:     23        Major Issue:    0

Minor Issue:       10        Not Started:     5

Growing Our Economy

Status Summary:

On Schedule:    32        Completed:     9          Major Issue:    1

Minor Issue:       4          Not Started:     0

A Sustainable Built and Natural Environment

Status Summary:

On Schedule:    27        Completed:     2          Major Issue:    0

Minor Issue:       2          Not Started:     2

How We Do Business

Status Summary:

On Schedule:    23        Completed:     5          Major Issue:    0

Minor Issue:       2          Not Started:     0


Environmental Implications

There are several actions under the Sustainable Built and Natural Environment Strategic Direction within City Plan that aim to enhance and protect natural areas and ecosystem health, support our community to live sustainably, advocate for and promote sustainable design and development, and minimise our environmental footprint.


Financial Implications

The City’s Annual Budget provides the Resource Plan to support the initiatives identified within the adopted Annual Business Plan. 


Policy/Legal/Statutory Implications

The City’s external auditors will undertake a Performance Audit of the planned Key Strategic Activities and prepare a report as part of the ‘sign off’ of the Annual Accounts.


Alignment to City Plan

This report is the progress report of the organisations achievements against the adopted City Plan 2013-2017, 2013-2014 actions.

Officer Direct or Indirect Interest

There is no conflict of interest to be disclosed.


Risk Assessment

The risks arising from the actions are managed within the framework of the City’s adopted Policies, Procedures and Risk Management strategies.


Social Considerations

Several of the actions identified within City Plan are aimed at improving the quality of life for the resident in the City of Greater Geelong. This is particularly the case for actions within the Community Wellbeing Strategic Direction.


Human Rights Charter

This report provides an update on the implementation of City Plan 2013-2017 and will be made available on Council’s website and on request at Council’s Customer Service Centres as part of the Council meeting minutes. There are no known positive or negative effects.


Consultation and Communication

A comprehensive report on the 2013-2014 City Plan actions will be published in the City of Greater Geelong Annual Report by September 30, 2014, which will be submitted to the Minister for Local Government and available to the public in hard copy and on the City’s website (www.geelongaustralia.com.au).


[Back to Top]


Contents | Previous Page: Section B - Reports (3-5) | Next Page: Section B - Reports (11-12)